Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
QTUM vs URA
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QTUM and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QTUM | Only in URA |
|---|---|
| Arqit Quantum Inc 2.43% | CAMECO CORPORATION 23.14% |
| Horizon Quantum Holdings LTD 2.40% | Oklo Inc 7.31% |
| Quantinuum Inc 1.58% | NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.27% |
| Astera Labs Inc 1.56% | URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 5.79% |
| Applied Materials Inc 1.56% | Joint stock company National atomic comp 4.81% |
| KLA Corp 1.51% | Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 4.33% |
| MKS Inc 1.51% | ENERGY FUELS INCORPORATED 4.24% |
| Onto Innovation Inc 1.50% | DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., L 4.07% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTUM | URA | QTUM | URA | QTUM | URA | |
| 3 months | −3.0% | +1.7% | −7.7 pts | −3.0 pts | −5.1 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +35.5% | −5.6% | +20.3 pts | −20.7 pts | +15.3 pts | −25.7 pts |
| 1 year | +58.6% | +19.6% | +38.7 pts | −0.4 pts | +33.0 pts | −6.0 pts |
| 3 years | +196.2% | +112.1% | +118.3 pts | +34.1 pts | +102.8 pts | +18.6 pts |
| Since launch | +538.2% | −30.8% | +337.0 pts | −760.5 pts | +225.3 pts | −1465.7 pts |
| QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | URA Global X Uranium ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Defiance | Global X |
| Theme | Quantum computing | Nuclear and uranium |
| In the S&P 500 | 35.6% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 83.5% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 27.8% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 86 | 52 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 17.0% | 66.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.48% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +58.6% | +19.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +38.7 pts | −0.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +33.0 pts | −6.0 pts |
| Below its high | −12.2% | −47.6% |
QTUM in plain words
By weight, 36% of QTUM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 17% of the fund across 86 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +58.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 38.7 pts. It sits 12.2% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Do QTUM and URA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, QTUM or URA?
- QTUM has 36% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, QTUM or URA?
- QTUM charges 0.40% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so QTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QTUM against URA, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/QTUM-URA.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.