Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
IFRA vs URA
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IFRA and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IFRA | URA |
|---|---|---|
| ENERGY FUELS INCORPORATED | 0.12% | 4.24% |
| Only in IFRA | Only in URA |
|---|---|
| CATERPILLAR INC. 4.57% | CAMECO CORPORATION 23.14% |
| NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. 3.97% | Oklo Inc 7.31% |
| UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 3.88% | NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.27% |
| QUANTA SERVICES, INC. 3.77% | URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 5.79% |
| CSX Corporation 3.10% | Joint stock company National atomic comp 4.81% |
| THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 2.92% | Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 4.33% |
| DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 2.67% | DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., L 4.07% |
| CRH PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 2.51% | PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.09% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRA | URA | IFRA | URA | IFRA | URA | |
| 3 months | −3.0% | +1.7% | −7.7 pts | −3.0 pts | −5.1 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +2.3% | −5.6% | −12.8 pts | −20.7 pts | −17.8 pts | −25.7 pts |
| 1 year | +16.3% | +19.6% | −3.7 pts | −0.4 pts | −9.3 pts | −6.0 pts |
| 3 years | +63.9% | +112.1% | −14.1 pts | +34.1 pts | −29.6 pts | +18.6 pts |
| Since launch | +173.3% | −30.8% | −55.9 pts | −760.5 pts | −199.2 pts | −1465.7 pts |
| IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | URA Global X Uranium ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | Global X |
| Theme | Infrastructure | Nuclear and uranium |
| In the S&P 500 | 75.7% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 95.4% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 10.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 161 | 52 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 32.4% | 66.1% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | not published | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.3% | +19.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −3.7 pts | −0.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −9.3 pts | −6.0 pts |
| Below its high | −7.5% | −47.6% |
IFRA in plain words
By weight, 76% of IFRA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 161 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.7 pts. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Do IFRA and URA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, IFRA or URA?
- IFRA has 76% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IFRA against URA, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/IFRA-URA.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.