Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
ICLN vs IGV
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ICLN and IGV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ICLN | Only in IGV |
|---|---|
| BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION 13.79% | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 10.38% |
| NEXTPOWER INC. 7.31% | Microsoft Corp. 8.08% |
| FIRST SOLAR, INC. 7.18% | Palantir Technologies, Inc. 7.71% |
| China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd. 5.92% | Crowdstrike Holdings, Inc. 7.29% |
| VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S 3.38% | Oracle Corp. 6.26% |
| PLUG POWER INC. 3.29% | Salesforce, Inc. 4.81% |
| ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. 3.26% | AppLovin Corp. 4.76% |
| EQUATORIAL S.A. 2.90% | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 3.92% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICLN | IGV | ICLN | IGV | ICLN | IGV | |
| 3 months | −16.4% | +9.1% | −21.1 pts | +4.4 pts | −18.5 pts | +7.0 pts |
| 6 months | +2.2% | +18.9% | −12.9 pts | +3.7 pts | −17.9 pts | −1.3 pts |
| 1 year | +25.3% | −2.1% | +5.3 pts | −22.1 pts | −0.3 pts | −27.7 pts |
| 3 years | +17.5% | +43.9% | −60.4 pts | −34.1 pts | −75.9 pts | −49.6 pts |
| Since launch | +10.6% | +1031.5% | −800.8 pts | +220.2 pts | −1673.5 pts | −652.5 pts |
| ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| Theme | Clean energy | Cloud and software |
| In the S&P 500 | 7.2% | 83.2% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 92.4% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 66.9% |
| Holdings | 122 | 107 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 51.8% | 60.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.38% | not published |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.38% | not published |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.3% | −2.1% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +5.3 pts | −22.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −0.3 pts | −27.7 pts |
| Below its high | −42.8% | −11.2% |
ICLN in plain words
By weight, 7% of ICLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 122 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. It sits 42.8% below its all-time high of Jan 7, 2021.
IGV in plain words
By weight, 83% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 107 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −2.1% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.1 pts. It sits 11.2% below its all-time high of Sep 22, 2025.
Questions people ask
- Do ICLN and IGV hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, ICLN or IGV?
- ICLN has 7% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGV has 83%, so ICLN differs more from the index.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ICLN against IGV, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ICLN-IGV.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.