Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
BOTZ vs IGV
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BOTZ and IGV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | BOTZ | IGV |
|---|---|---|
| UIPATH, INC. | 1.09% | 0.18% |
| APPIAN CORPORATION | 0.20% | 0.04% |
| Only in BOTZ | Only in IGV |
|---|---|
| KEYENCE CORPORATION 9.34% | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 10.38% |
| ABB Ltd 9.07% | Microsoft Corp. 8.08% |
| FANUC CORPORATION 9.02% | Palantir Technologies, Inc. 7.71% |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.31% | Crowdstrike Holdings, Inc. 7.29% |
| INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. 6.17% | Oracle Corp. 6.26% |
| Shenzhen Inovance Technology Co., Ltd 4.34% | Salesforce, Inc. 4.81% |
| SMC CORPORATION 4.03% | AppLovin Corp. 4.76% |
| DAIFUKU CO., LTD. 3.53% | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 3.92% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOTZ | IGV | BOTZ | IGV | BOTZ | IGV | |
| 3 months | −5.3% | +9.1% | −10.0 pts | +4.4 pts | −7.4 pts | +7.0 pts |
| 6 months | −0.3% | +18.9% | −15.5 pts | +3.7 pts | −20.5 pts | −1.3 pts |
| 1 year | +8.6% | −2.1% | −11.3 pts | −22.1 pts | −16.9 pts | −27.7 pts |
| 3 years | +36.4% | +43.9% | −41.5 pts | −34.1 pts | −57.0 pts | −49.6 pts |
| Since launch | +153.8% | +1031.5% | −170.6 pts | +220.2 pts | −415.5 pts | −652.5 pts |
| BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF | IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | iShares |
| Theme | Robotics and automation | Cloud and software |
| In the S&P 500 | 18.7% | 83.2% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 88.1% | 92.4% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 18.7% | 66.9% |
| Holdings | 61 | 107 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 59.0% | 60.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | not published |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.77% | not published |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.6% | −2.1% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −11.3 pts | −22.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −16.9 pts | −27.7 pts |
| Below its high | −13.6% | −11.2% |
BOTZ in plain words
By weight, 19% of BOTZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. It sits 13.6% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.
IGV in plain words
By weight, 83% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 107 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −2.1% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.1 pts. It sits 11.2% below its all-time high of Sep 22, 2025.
Questions people ask
- Do BOTZ and IGV hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or IGV?
- BOTZ has 19% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGV has 83%, so IGV differs more from the index.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOTZ against IGV, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/BOTZ-IGV.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.