ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.

CIBR vs IGV

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF, side by side on the themes desk.

27% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CIBR and IGV hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CIBR and IGV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCIBRIGV
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.8.92%10.38%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A)8.79%7.29%
Fortinet, Inc.8.54%3.62%
Microsoft Corporation2.09%8.08%
Datadog, Inc. (Class A)1.62%3.26%
Zscaler, Inc.3.47%0.55%
Gen Digital Inc.2.50%0.52%
Rubrik, Inc. (Class A)2.95%0.49%
Dynatrace, Inc.2.30%0.49%
BlackBerry Ltd.0.89%0.26%
Commvault Systems, Inc.0.88%0.22%
SentinelOne, Inc. (Class A)1.17%0.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CIBROnly in IGV
Cisco Systems, Inc. 6.84%Palantir Technologies, Inc. 7.71%
Broadcom Inc. 6.04%Oracle Corp. 6.26%
Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 4.35%Salesforce, Inc. 4.81%
Okta, Inc. 4.17%AppLovin Corp. 4.76%
F5, Inc. 3.04%Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 3.92%
Akamai Technologies, Inc. 2.40%ServiceNow, Inc. 3.87%
Arista Networks, Inc. 2.29%Synopsys, Inc. 3.23%
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 2.12%Adobe, Inc. 3.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 4, 2026.

Performance, window by window

CIBR and IGV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
CIBRIGVCIBRIGVCIBRIGV
3 months+9.2%+9.1%+4.5 pts+4.4 pts+7.1 pts+7.0 pts
6 months+43.7%+18.9%+28.5 pts+3.7 pts+23.5 pts−1.3 pts
1 year+31.4%−2.1%+11.5 pts−22.1 pts+5.9 pts−27.7 pts
3 years+102.4%+43.9%+24.5 pts−34.1 pts+8.9 pts−49.6 pts
Since launch+402.1%+1031.5%+57.6 pts+220.2 pts−220.6 pts−652.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CIBR and IGV on the themes desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
IssuerFirst TrustiShares
ThemeCybersecurityCloud and software
In the S&P 50061.9%83.2%
Active share vs the S&P 50090.7%92.4%
In the Nasdaq-10047.9%66.9%
Holdings43107
Top ten, share of the fund56.9%60.7%
Expense ratio0.58%not published
Fee for the differing part0.64%not published
Total return, 1 year+31.4%−2.1%
vs the S&P 500+11.5 pts−22.1 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100+5.9 pts−27.7 pts
Below its high−7.5%−11.2%

CIBR in plain words

By weight, 62% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 43 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.4% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 11.5 pts. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.

IGV in plain words

By weight, 83% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 107 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −2.1% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.1 pts. It sits 11.2% below its all-time high of Sep 22, 2025.

Questions people ask

Do CIBR and IGV hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 27% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or IGV?
CIBR has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGV has 83%, so IGV differs more from the index.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CIBR against IGV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CIBR against IGV, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/CIBR-IGV.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources