Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
COPX vs IGV
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COPX and IGV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in COPX | Only in IGV |
|---|---|
| Lundin Mining Corporation 6.07% | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 10.38% |
| GLENCORE PLC 6.00% | Microsoft Corp. 8.08% |
| Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 5.98% | Palantir Technologies, Inc. 7.71% |
| KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 5.82% | Crowdstrike Holdings, Inc. 7.29% |
| FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. 5.06% | Oracle Corp. 6.26% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. 4.95% | Salesforce, Inc. 4.81% |
| BHP GROUP LIMITED 4.92% | AppLovin Corp. 4.76% |
| ANTOFAGASTA PLC 4.87% | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 3.92% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | IGV | COPX | IGV | COPX | IGV | |
| 3 months | +12.8% | +9.1% | +8.1 pts | +4.4 pts | +10.7 pts | +7.0 pts |
| 6 months | +13.8% | +18.9% | −1.4 pts | +3.7 pts | −6.4 pts | −1.3 pts |
| 1 year | +85.6% | −2.1% | +65.7 pts | −22.1 pts | +60.0 pts | −27.7 pts |
| 3 years | +153.8% | +43.9% | +75.8 pts | −34.1 pts | +60.3 pts | −49.6 pts |
| Since launch | +191.0% | +1031.5% | −559.9 pts | +220.2 pts | −1371.8 pts | −652.5 pts |
| COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | iShares |
| Theme | Electrification and the grid | Cloud and software |
| In the S&P 500 | 5.1% | 83.2% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.9% | 92.4% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 66.9% |
| Holdings | 39 | 107 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 53.4% | 60.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | not published |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | not published |
| Total return, 1 year | +85.6% | −2.1% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +65.7 pts | −22.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +60.0 pts | −27.7 pts |
| Below its high | −6.0% | −11.2% |
COPX in plain words
By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +85.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 65.7 pts. It sits 6.0% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.
IGV in plain words
By weight, 83% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 107 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −2.1% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.1 pts. It sits 11.2% below its all-time high of Sep 22, 2025.
Questions people ask
- Do COPX and IGV hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or IGV?
- COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGV has 83%, so COPX differs more from the index.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COPX against IGV, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/COPX-IGV.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.