Data as of .
GDXJ vs GRID: which is really different?
GDXJ and GRID hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and GDXJ returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: GDXJ scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 349 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GDXJ and GRID hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GDXJ | Only in GRID |
|---|---|
| Evolution Mining Ltd 6.38% | Schneider Electric SE 9.13% |
| Equinox Gold Corp 6.28% | Eaton Corporation Plc 8.86% |
| Alamos Gold Inc 6.23% | Johnson Controls International Plc 8.45% |
| Endeavour Mining PLC 5.33% | ABB Ltd 7.72% |
| Coeur Mining Inc 5.15% | Quanta Services, Inc. 7.54% |
| Industrias Penoles SAB de CV 2.89% | E.ON SE 4.16% |
| First Majestic Silver Corp 2.72% | National Grid Plc 4.10% |
| Hecla Mining Co 2.63% | Prysmian SpA 3.57% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDXJ | GRID | GDXJ | GRID | GDXJ | GRID | |
| 3 months | +20.3% | −4.0% | +17.0 pts | −7.3 pts | +21.1 pts | −3.2 pts |
| 6 months | +1.2% | +9.9% | −14.8 pts | −6.1 pts | −19.5 pts | −10.8 pts |
| 1 year | +42.4% | +22.9% | +24.9 pts | +5.4 pts | +19.4 pts | 0.0 pts |
| 3 years | +284.5% | +88.9% | +206.6 pts | +11.0 pts | +189.4 pts | −6.2 pts |
| Since launch | +65.3% | +560.9% | −739.1 pts | −243.5 pts | −1608.6 pts | −1113.0 pts |
| GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF Holds 110 stocks in miners and metals, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund Holds 122 stocks in electrification and the grid, 40% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VanEck | First Trust |
| Theme | Miners and metals | Electrification and the grid |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 40.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 92.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 8.5% |
| Holdings | 110 | 122 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 42.4% | 58.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.56% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.52% | 0.61% |
| Total return, 1 year | +42.4% | +22.9% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +24.9 pts | +5.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +19.4 pts | 0.0 pts |
| Below its high | −19.7% | −9.2% |
GDXJ in plain words
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 110 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +42.4% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 24.9 pts. It sits 19.7% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
GRID in plain words
By weight, 40% of GRID's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 122 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.4 pts. It sits 9.2% below its all-time high of May 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do GDXJ and GRID hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, GDXJ or GRID?
- GDXJ has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GRID has 40%, so GDXJ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, GDXJ or GRID?
- GDXJ charges 0.52% a year and GRID charges 0.56%, so GDXJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GDXJ against GRID, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/GDXJ-GRID Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.