Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
CIBR vs GRID
4% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CIBR and GRID hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CIBR | GRID |
|---|---|---|
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | 6.84% | 1.66% |
| International Business Machines Corporat | 1.49% | 0.85% |
| US Dollar | 0.37% | 0.26% |
| Only in CIBR | Only in GRID |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 8.92% | Schneider Electric SE 9.11% |
| CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 8.79% | Eaton Corporation Plc 8.80% |
| Fortinet, Inc. 8.54% | Johnson Controls International Plc 8.49% |
| Broadcom Inc. 6.04% | ABB Ltd 7.70% |
| Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 4.35% | Quanta Services, Inc. 7.53% |
| Okta, Inc. 4.17% | National Grid Plc 4.14% |
| Zscaler, Inc. 3.47% | E.ON SE 4.11% |
| F5, Inc. 3.04% | Prysmian SpA 3.53% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Sep 4, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | GRID | CIBR | GRID | CIBR | GRID | |
| 3 months | +9.2% | −4.2% | +4.5 pts | −8.9 pts | +7.1 pts | −6.3 pts |
| 6 months | +43.7% | +8.4% | +28.5 pts | −6.8 pts | +23.5 pts | −11.8 pts |
| 1 year | +31.4% | +26.6% | +11.5 pts | +6.6 pts | +5.9 pts | +1.0 pts |
| 3 years | +102.4% | +85.1% | +24.5 pts | +7.1 pts | +8.9 pts | −8.4 pts |
| Since launch | +402.1% | +554.4% | +57.6 pts | −257.0 pts | −220.6 pts | −1129.7 pts |
| CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | First Trust |
| Theme | Cybersecurity | Electrification and the grid |
| In the S&P 500 | 61.9% | 39.9% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 90.7% | 91.9% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 47.9% | 8.6% |
| Holdings | 43 | 121 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 56.9% | 58.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.56% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.64% | 0.61% |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.4% | +26.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +11.5 pts | +6.6 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +5.9 pts | +1.0 pts |
| Below its high | −7.5% | −10.1% |
CIBR in plain words
By weight, 62% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 43 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.4% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 11.5 pts. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.
GRID in plain words
By weight, 40% of GRID's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 121 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 6.6 pts. It sits 10.1% below its all-time high of May 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do CIBR and GRID hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or GRID?
- CIBR has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GRID has 40%, so GRID differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, CIBR or GRID?
- CIBR charges 0.58% a year and GRID charges 0.56%, so GRID is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CIBR against GRID, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/CIBR-GRID.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.