Data as of .
AIQ vs GDXJ: which is really different?
AIQ and GDXJ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and GDXJ returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: GDXJ scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 349 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AIQ and GDXJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AIQ | Only in GDXJ |
|---|---|
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A 3.72% | Evolution Mining Ltd 6.38% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 3.57% | Equinox Gold Corp 6.28% |
| SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 3.51% | Alamos Gold Inc 6.23% |
| ORACLE CORP 3.44% | Endeavour Mining PLC 5.33% |
| TESLA INC 3.14% | Coeur Mining Inc 5.15% |
| NETFLIX INC 3.08% | Industrias Penoles SAB de CV 2.89% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.02% | First Majestic Silver Corp 2.72% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 2.94% | Hecla Mining Co 2.63% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIQ | GDXJ | AIQ | GDXJ | AIQ | GDXJ | |
| 3 months | 0.0% | +20.3% | −3.3 pts | +17.0 pts | +0.8 pts | +21.1 pts |
| 6 months | +32.3% | +1.2% | +16.3 pts | −14.8 pts | +11.6 pts | −19.5 pts |
| 1 year | +35.7% | +42.4% | +18.2 pts | +24.9 pts | +12.7 pts | +19.4 pts |
| 3 years | +127.6% | +284.5% | +49.7 pts | +206.6 pts | +32.5 pts | +189.4 pts |
| Since launch | +337.9% | +65.3% | +119.2 pts | −739.1 pts | −8.8 pts | −1608.6 pts |
| AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF Holds 89 stocks in artificial intelligence, 56% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF Holds 110 stocks in miners and metals, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | VanEck |
| Theme | Artificial intelligence | Miners and metals |
| In the S&P 500 | 55.9% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 69.7% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 47.5% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 89 | 110 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 32.2% | 42.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.52% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.98% | 0.52% |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +42.4% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | +24.9 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +12.7 pts | +19.4 pts |
| Below its high | −8.8% | −19.7% |
AIQ in plain words
By weight, 56% of AIQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 70%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 89 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 18.2 pts. It sits 8.8% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
GDXJ in plain words
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 110 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +42.4% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 24.9 pts. It sits 19.7% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do AIQ and GDXJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, AIQ or GDXJ?
- AIQ has 56% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GDXJ has 0%, so GDXJ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, AIQ or GDXJ?
- AIQ charges 0.68% a year and GDXJ charges 0.52%, so GDXJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIQ against GDXJ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/AIQ-GDXJ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.