TYD vs UST: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, TYD finished 2.3 points short and UST 0.9 points short. Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF and ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury.

−15.0%
TYD returned, 3 months
−9.5%
UST returned, 3 months
−2.0 pts
TYD from its stated multiple
−0.8 pts
UST from its stated multiple
TYD · 3 months to Sep 30, 20262 pts short of its stated multiple
2 pts short of its stated multipleTYD returned −15.0% while 3 times IEF's move would have been −13.1%IEF −4.3% ×3 implies−13.1%TYD returned−15.0%2 pts short of its stated multipleTYD returned −15.0% while 3 times IEF's move would have been −13.1%IEF −4.3% ×3 implies−13.1%TYD returned−15.0%

TYD returned −15.0% while 3 times IEF's move would have been −13.1%

UST · 3 months to Sep 30, 20260.8 pts short of its stated multiple
0.8 pts short of its stated multipleUST returned −9.5% while 2 times IEF's move would have been −8.7%IEF −4.3% ×2 implies−8.7%UST returned−9.5%0.8 pts short of its stated multipleUST returned −9.5% while 2 times IEF's move would have been −8.7%IEF −4.3% ×2 implies−8.7%UST returned−9.5%

UST returned −9.5% while 2 times IEF's move would have been −8.7%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · UST scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowTYDUSTTYDUSTTYDUST
1 month−10.6%−6.9%−10.1%−6.7%−0.5 pts−0.2 pts
3 months−15.0%−9.5%−13.1%−8.7%−2.0 pts−0.8 pts
6 months−17.3%−10.5%−13.3%−8.8%−4.0 pts−1.7 pts
1 year−20.0%−11.2%−11.2%−7.5%−8.8 pts−3.7 pts
3 years−10.7%+1.7%+26.8%+17.9%−37.5 pts−16.2 pts
Since launch
TYD Jan 2010 · UST Feb 2010
+30.9%+36.3%+141.4%+88.6%−110.5 pts−52.4 pts

TYD and UST over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

TYD
Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF · Aims to return three times the daily move of 10-year Treasuries (IEF)
UST
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury · Aims to return twice the daily move of 10-year Treasuries (IEF)
Issuer Direxion ProShares
Sets out to return +3x +2x
Underlying asset IEF IEF
Segment bond bond
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −15.0% −9.5%
Underlying returned, over that window −4.3% −4.3%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −13.1% −8.7%
Difference from stated, over that window −2.0 pts −0.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −20.0% −11.2%
Difference from stated, over that window −8.8 pts −3.7 pts
Underlying volatility 5% 5%
Expense ratio 1.07% 0.95%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Feb 2, 2010
Net assets $26m $15m

TYD and UST on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

TYD in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: TYD returned −15.0% where its own daily promise gave −12.7%, 2.3 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 3 times IEF's −4.3% implies −13.1%, which makes TYD look 2.0 points short. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TYD aims to return +3 times IEF's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. IEF moved at 5% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

UST in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: UST returned −9.5% where its own daily promise gave −8.6%, 0.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times IEF's −4.3% implies −8.7%, which makes UST look 0.8 points short. 0.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. UST aims to return +2 times IEF's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TYD or UST?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, TYD finished 2.0 points from what its multiple implies and UST finished 0.8 points from its own, so UST came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TYD and UST levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on 10-year Treasuries, TYD at +3 times and UST at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TYD or UST?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TYD’s moved at 5% annualized and UST’s at 5%, so TYD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TYD or UST for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TYD or UST?
TYD charges 1.07% a year and UST charges 0.95%, so UST is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, TYD against UST, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/tyd-vs-ust

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.