TSLG vs TSLQ: which held to its multiple?
Over three months against its own daily promise, TSLG finished 1.8 points short and TSLQ 2.4 points over. Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF.
TSLG returned −37.4% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −33.1%
TSLQ returned +19.7% while −2 times TSLA's move would have been +33.1%
TSLG among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months
TSLQ among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months
A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. TSLQ is a percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | TSLG | TSLQ | TSLG | TSLQ | TSLG | TSLQ |
| 1 month | −9.3% | +4.0% | −7.1% | +7.1% | −2.1 pts | −3.2 pts |
| 3 months | −37.4% | +19.7% | −33.1% | +33.1% | −4.2 pts | −13.5 pts |
| 6 months | −28.4% | −16.8% | −13.9% | +13.9% | −14.5 pts | −30.7 pts |
| 1 year | −54.6% | −9.7% | −40.4% | +40.4% | −14.2 pts | −50.1 pts |
| 3 years | not published | −95.5% | not published | −83.6% | not published | −11.9 pts |
| Since launch TSLG Dec 2024 · TSLQ Jul 2022 | −70.5% | −97.0% | −37.3% | −97.8% | −33.1 pts | +0.8 pts |
TSLG and TSLQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
TSLG and TSLQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TSLG in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: TSLG returned −37.4% where its own daily promise gave −35.6%, 1.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times TSLA's −16.6% implies −33.1%, which makes TSLG look 4.2 points short. 2.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLG aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 52% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
TSLQ in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: TSLQ returned +19.7% where its own daily promise gave +17.3%, 2.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times TSLA's −16.6% implies +33.1%, which makes TSLQ look 13.5 points short. 15.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLQ aims to return -2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, TSLG or TSLQ?
- Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, TSLG finished 4.2 points from what its multiple implies and TSLQ finished 13.5 points from its own, so TSLG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are TSLG and TSLQ levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TSLG at +2 times and TSLQ at -2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, TSLG or TSLQ?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TSLG’s moved at 52% annualized and TSLQ’s at 52%, so TSLG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold TSLG or TSLQ for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, TSLG against TSLQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/tslg-vs-tslq
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TSLG against TSLQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/tslg-vs-tslq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, TSLG against TSLQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/tslg-vs-tslq
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). TSLG against TSLQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/tslg-vs-tslq
- Markdown
- [TSLG against TSLQ (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/tslg-vs-tslq)