SPAX vs SPCG: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, SPAX finished 3.4 points short and SPCG 1.1 points over. T-REX 2X Long SpaceX Daily Target ETF and Tradr 2X Short SpaceX Daily ETF.

−22.0%
SPAX returned, 3 months
−24.0%
SPCG returned, 3 months
−13.5 pts
SPAX from its stated multiple
−32.5 pts
SPCG from its stated multiple
SPAX · 3 months to Sep 30, 202613.5 pts short of its stated multiple
13.5 pts short of its stated multipleSPAX returned −22.0% while 2 times SPCX's move would have been −8.5%SPCX −4.2% ×2 implies−8.5%SPAX returned−22.0%13.5 pts short of its stated multipleSPAX returned −22.0% while 2 times SPCX's move would have been −8.5%SPCX −4.2% ×2 implies−8.5%SPAX returned−22.0%

SPAX returned −22.0% while 2 times SPCX's move would have been −8.5%

SPCG · 3 months to Sep 30, 202632.5 pts short of its stated multiple
32.5 pts short of its stated multipleSPCG returned −24.0% while −2 times SPCX's move would have been +8.5%SPCX −4.2% ×−2 implies+8.5%SPCG returned−24.0%32.5 pts short of its stated multipleSPCG returned −24.0% while −2 times SPCX's move would have been +8.5%SPCX −4.2% ×−2 implies+8.5%SPCG returned−24.0%

SPCG returned −24.0% while −2 times SPCX's move would have been +8.5%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · SPAX scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

SPAX among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months

SPAX 32.7
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

SPCG among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months

SPCG 29.2
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. SPCG is a percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowSPAXSPCGSPAXSPCGSPAXSPCG
1 month+7.3%−13.2%+10.0%−10.0%−2.7 pts−3.3 pts
3 months−22.0%−24.0%−8.5%+8.5%−13.5 pts−32.5 pts
Since launch
SPAX Jun 2026 · SPCG Jun 2026
−51.3%−1.4%−43.3%+43.3%−8.1 pts−44.7 pts

SPAX and SPCG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

SPAX
T-REX 2X Long SpaceX Daily Target ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
SPCG
Tradr 2X Short SpaceX Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
Issuer T-REX Tradr
Sets out to return +2x -2x
Underlying asset SPCX SPCX
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −22.0% −24.0%
Underlying returned, over that window −4.2% −4.2%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −8.5% +8.5%
Difference from stated, over that window −13.5 pts −32.5 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −51.3% −1.4%
Difference from stated, over that window −8.1 pts −44.7 pts
Underlying volatility 70% 70%
Difference over the days both have traded −13.5 pts −3.3 pts
Expense ratio 1.50% 1.49%
Launched Jun 15, 2026 Jun 15, 2026
Net assets $46m $13m

SPAX and SPCG on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

SPAX in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SPAX returned −22.0% where its own daily promise gave −18.6%, 3.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times SPCX's −4.2% implies −8.5%, which makes SPAX look 13.5 points short. 10.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPAX aims to return +2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPCX moved at 70% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SPCG in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SPCG returned −24.0% where its own daily promise gave −25.1%, 1.1 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SPCX's −4.2% implies +8.5%, which makes SPCG look 32.5 points short. 33.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPCG aims to return -2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SPAX or SPCG?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, SPAX finished 13.5 points from what its multiple implies and SPCG finished 32.5 points from its own, so SPAX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SPAX and SPCG levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, SPAX at +2 times and SPCG at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SPAX or SPCG?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SPAX’s moved at 70% annualized and SPCG’s at 70%, so SPAX has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SPAX or SPCG for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SPAX or SPCG?
SPAX charges 1.50% a year and SPCG charges 1.49%, so SPCG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, SPAX against SPCG, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/spax-vs-spcg

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.