SMCC vs SMCX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, SMCC finished 23.6 points from its stated multiple and SMCX 24.1. Corgi SMCI 2x Daily ETF and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF.

+73.4%
SMCC returned, 3 months
+73.0%
SMCX returned, 3 months
−23.6 pts
SMCC from its stated multiple
−24.1 pts
SMCX from its stated multiple
SMCC · 3 months to Sep 30, 202623.6 pts short of its stated multiple
23.6 pts short of its stated multipleSMCC returned +73.4% while 2 times SMCI's move would have been +97.1%SMCI +48.5% ×2 implies+97.1%SMCC returned+73.4%23.6 pts short of its stated multipleSMCC returned +73.4% while 2 times SMCI's move would have been +97.1%SMCI +48.5% ×2 implies+97.1%SMCC returned+73.4%

SMCC returned +73.4% while 2 times SMCI's move would have been +97.1%

SMCX · 3 months to Sep 30, 202624.1 pts short of its stated multiple
24.1 pts short of its stated multipleSMCX returned +73.0% while 2 times SMCI's move would have been +97.1%SMCI +48.5% ×2 implies+97.1%SMCX returned+73.0%24.1 pts short of its stated multipleSMCX returned +73.0% while 2 times SMCI's move would have been +97.1%SMCI +48.5% ×2 implies+97.1%SMCX returned+73.0%

SMCX returned +73.0% while 2 times SMCI's move would have been +97.1%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · SMCC scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowSMCCSMCXSMCCSMCXSMCCSMCX
1 month+14.1%+14.4%+20.3%+20.3%−6.3 pts−5.9 pts
3 months+73.4%+73.0%+97.1%+97.1%−23.6 pts−24.1 pts
6 monthsnot published+64.3%not published+164.9%not published−100.6 pts
1 yearnot published−81.6%not published−28.7%not published−53.0 pts
Since launch
SMCC Jun 2026 · SMCX Aug 2024
+54.4%−98.1%+80.1%−64.2%−25.7 pts−33.9 pts

SMCC and SMCX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

SMCC
Corgi SMCI 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Super Micro Computer (SMCI)
SMCX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Super Micro Computer (SMCI)
Issuer Corgi Defiance
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset SMCI SMCI
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +73.4% +73.0%
Underlying returned, over that window +48.5% +48.5%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +97.1% +97.1%
Difference from stated, over that window −23.6 pts −24.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +54.4% −81.6%
Difference from stated, over that window −25.7 pts −53.0 pts
Underlying volatility 86% 86%
Difference over the days both have traded −23.6 pts −24.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.45% 1.32%
Launched Jun 30, 2026 Aug 22, 2024
Net assets $415,760 $192m

SMCC and SMCX on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

SMCC in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SMCC returned +73.4% where its own daily promise gave +86.9%, 13.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times SMCI's 48.5% implies +97.1%, which makes SMCC look 23.6 points short. 10.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SMCC aims to return +2 times SMCI's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SMCI moved at 86% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SMCX in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SMCX returned +73.0% where its own daily promise gave +86.9%, 13.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times SMCI's 48.5% implies +97.1%, which makes SMCX look 24.1 points short. SMCX aims to return +2 times SMCI's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SMCC or SMCX?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, SMCC finished 23.6 points from what its multiple implies and SMCX finished 24.1 points from its own, so SMCC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SMCC and SMCX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Super Micro Computer, SMCC at +2 times and SMCX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SMCC or SMCX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SMCC’s moved at 86% annualized and SMCX’s at 86%, so SMCC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SMCC or SMCX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SMCC or SMCX?
SMCC charges 0.45% a year and SMCX charges 1.32%, so SMCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, SMCC against SMCX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/smcc-vs-smcx

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.