SBB vs SDD: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, SBB finished 1.6 points over and SDD 3.0 points over. ProShares Short SmallCap600 and ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600.

+9.3%
SBB returned, 3 months
+18.6%
SDD returned, 3 months
+1.9 pts
SBB from its stated multiple
+3.7 pts
SDD from its stated multiple
SBB · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.9 pts ahead of its stated multiple
1.9 pts ahead of its stated multipleSBB returned +9.3% while −1 times IJR's move would have been +7.5%IJR −7.5% ×−1 implies+7.5%SBB returned+9.3%1.9 pts ahead of its stated multipleSBB returned +9.3% while −1 times IJR's move would have been +7.5%IJR −7.5% ×−1 implies+7.5%SBB returned+9.3%

SBB returned +9.3% while −1 times IJR's move would have been +7.5%

SDD · 3 months to Sep 30, 20263.7 pts ahead of its stated multiple
3.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleSDD returned +18.6% while −2 times IJR's move would have been +14.9%IJR −7.5% ×−2 implies+14.9%SDD returned+18.6%3.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleSDD returned +18.6% while −2 times IJR's move would have been +14.9%IJR −7.5% ×−2 implies+14.9%SDD returned+18.6%

SDD returned +18.6% while −2 times IJR's move would have been +14.9%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · SDD scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowSBBSDDSBBSDDSBBSDD
1 month+6.2%+12.4%+5.5%+11.1%+0.7 pts+1.4 pts
3 months+9.3%+18.6%+7.5%+14.9%+1.9 pts+3.7 pts
6 months−7.2%−15.1%−9.6%−19.3%+2.5 pts+4.2 pts
1 year−10.7%−24.6%−16.0%−31.9%+5.3 pts+7.4 pts
3 years−27.1%−57.1%−51.1%−102.2%+24.0 pts+45.0 pts
Since launch
SBB Jan 2010 · SDD Jan 2010
−90.8%−99.7%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

SBB and SDD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

SBB
ProShares Short SmallCap600 · Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR)
SDD
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR)
Issuer ProShares ProShares
Sets out to return -1x -2x
Underlying asset IJR IJR
Segment us small cap us small cap
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +9.3% +18.6%
Underlying returned, over that window −7.5% −7.5%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +7.5% +14.9%
Difference from stated, over that window +1.9 pts +3.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −10.7% −24.6%
Difference from stated, over that window +5.3 pts +7.4 pts
Underlying volatility 12% 12%
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.95%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Jan 4, 2010
Net assets $4m $2m

SBB and SDD on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

SBB in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SBB returned +9.3% where its own daily promise gave +7.7%, 1.6 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times IJR's −7.5% implies +7.5%, which makes SBB look 1.9 points over. 0.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SBB aims to return -1 times IJR's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. IJR moved at 12% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SDD in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SDD returned +18.6% where its own daily promise gave +15.6%, 3.0 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times IJR's −7.5% implies +14.9%, which makes SDD look 3.7 points over. 0.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SDD aims to return -2 times IJR's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SBB or SDD?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, SBB finished 1.9 points from what its multiple implies and SDD finished 3.7 points from its own, so SBB came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SBB and SDD levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF, SBB at -1 times and SDD at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SBB or SDD?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SBB’s moved at 12% annualized and SDD’s at 12%, so SBB has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SBB or SDD for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SBB or SDD?
SBB charges 0.95% a year and SDD charges 0.95%, so SBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, SBB against SDD, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/sbb-vs-sdd

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.