PLTL vs PLTU: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, PLTL finished 3.2 points from its stated multiple and PLTU 3.6. Corgi PLTR 2x Daily ETF and Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF.

+94.4%
PLTL returned, 3 months
+93.9%
PLTU returned, 3 months
−3.2 pts
PLTL from its stated multiple
−3.6 pts
PLTU from its stated multiple
PLTL · 3 months to Sep 30, 20263.2 pts short of its stated multiple
3.2 pts short of its stated multiplePLTL returned +94.4% while 2 times PLTR's move would have been +97.5%PLTR +48.8% ×2 implies+97.5%PLTL returned+94.4%3.2 pts short of its stated multiplePLTL returned +94.4% while 2 times PLTR's move would have been +97.5%PLTR +48.8% ×2 implies+97.5%PLTL returned+94.4%

PLTL returned +94.4% while 2 times PLTR's move would have been +97.5%

PLTU · 3 months to Sep 30, 20263.6 pts short of its stated multiple
3.6 pts short of its stated multiplePLTU returned +93.9% while 2 times PLTR's move would have been +97.5%PLTR +48.8% ×2 implies+97.5%PLTU returned+93.9%3.6 pts short of its stated multiplePLTU returned +93.9% while 2 times PLTR's move would have been +97.5%PLTR +48.8% ×2 implies+97.5%PLTU returned+93.9%

PLTU returned +93.9% while 2 times PLTR's move would have been +97.5%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · PLTL scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowPLTLPLTUPLTLPLTUPLTLPLTU
1 month−1.3%−1.7%+0.7%+0.7%−2.0 pts−2.4 pts
3 months+94.4%+93.9%+97.5%+97.5%−3.2 pts−3.6 pts
6 monthsnot published+27.8%not published+55.4%not published−27.6 pts
1 yearnot published−32.7%not published+5.1%not published−37.8 pts
Since launch
PLTL Jun 2026 · PLTU Dec 2024
+125.1%+164.7%+120.6%not meaningful+4.4 ptsnot meaningful

PLTL and PLTU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

PLTL
Corgi PLTR 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Palantir Technologies (PLTR)
PLTU
Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Palantir Technologies (PLTR)
Issuer Corgi Direxion
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset PLTR PLTR
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +94.4% +93.9%
Underlying returned, over that window +48.8% +48.8%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +97.5% +97.5%
Difference from stated, over that window −3.2 pts −3.6 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +125.1% −32.7%
Difference from stated, over that window +4.4 pts −37.8 pts
Underlying volatility 75% 75%
Difference over the days both have traded −3.2 pts −3.6 pts
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.97%
Launched Jun 30, 2026 Dec 11, 2024
Net assets $990,282 $439m

PLTL and PLTU on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

PLTL in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: PLTL returned +94.4% where its own daily promise gave +98.7%, 4.3 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times PLTR's 48.8% implies +97.5%, which makes PLTL look 3.2 points short. 1.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. PLTL aims to return +2 times PLTR's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. PLTR moved at 75% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

PLTU in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: PLTU returned +93.9% where its own daily promise gave +98.7%, 4.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times PLTR's 48.8% implies +97.5%, which makes PLTU look 3.6 points short. PLTU aims to return +2 times PLTR's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, PLTL or PLTU?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, PLTL finished 3.2 points from what its multiple implies and PLTU finished 3.6 points from its own, so PLTL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are PLTL and PLTU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Palantir Technologies, PLTL at +2 times and PLTU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, PLTL or PLTU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window PLTL’s moved at 75% annualized and PLTU’s at 75%, so PLTL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold PLTL or PLTU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, PLTL or PLTU?
PLTL charges 0.20% a year and PLTU charges 0.97%, so PLTL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, PLTL against PLTU, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/pltl-vs-pltu

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.