NVC vs NVDL: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, NVC finished 4.5 points from its stated multiple and NVDL 5.5. Corgi NVDA 2x Daily ETF and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF.

+26.9%
NVC returned, 3 months
+26.0%
NVDL returned, 3 months
−4.5 pts
NVC from its stated multiple
−5.5 pts
NVDL from its stated multiple
NVC · 3 months to Sep 30, 20264.5 pts short of its stated multiple
4.5 pts short of its stated multipleNVC returned +26.9% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +31.4%NVDA +15.7% ×2 implies+31.4%NVC returned+26.9%4.5 pts short of its stated multipleNVC returned +26.9% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +31.4%NVDA +15.7% ×2 implies+31.4%NVC returned+26.9%

NVC returned +26.9% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +31.4%

NVDL · 3 months to Sep 30, 20265.5 pts short of its stated multiple
5.5 pts short of its stated multipleNVDL returned +26.0% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +31.4%NVDA +15.7% ×2 implies+31.4%NVDL returned+26.0%5.5 pts short of its stated multipleNVDL returned +26.0% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +31.4%NVDA +15.7% ×2 implies+31.4%NVDL returned+26.0%

NVDL returned +26.0% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +31.4%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · NVC scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowNVCNVDLNVCNVDLNVCNVDL
1 month+6.7%+5.6%+7.1%+7.1%−0.5 pts−1.5 pts
3 months+26.9%+26.0%+31.4%+31.4%−4.5 pts−5.5 pts
6 monthsnot published+49.4%not published+60.5%not published−11.1 pts
1 yearnot published+17.6%not published+45.4%not published−27.8 pts
3 yearsnot published+766.9%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningful
Since launch
NVC Jun 2026 · NVDL Dec 2022
+24.7%+2711.9%+28.5%not meaningful−3.9 ptsnot meaningful

NVC and NVDL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NVC
Corgi NVDA 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
Issuer Corgi GraniteShares
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset NVDA NVDA
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +26.9% +26.0%
Underlying returned, over that window +15.7% +15.7%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +31.4% +31.4%
Difference from stated, over that window −4.5 pts −5.5 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +24.7% +17.6%
Difference from stated, over that window −3.9 pts −27.8 pts
Underlying volatility 38% 38%
Difference over the days both have traded −4.5 pts −5.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.45% 1.05%
Launched Jun 30, 2026 Dec 13, 2022
Net assets $479,525 $3.8bn

NVC and NVDL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NVC in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: NVC returned +26.9% where its own daily promise gave +29.2%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times NVDA's 15.7% implies +31.4%, which makes NVC look 4.5 points short. 2.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NVC aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NVDA moved at 38% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NVDL in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: NVDL returned +26.0% where its own daily promise gave +29.2%, 3.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times NVDA's 15.7% implies +31.4%, which makes NVDL look 5.5 points short. NVDL aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NVC or NVDL?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, NVC finished 4.5 points from what its multiple implies and NVDL finished 5.5 points from its own, so NVC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NVC and NVDL levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on NVIDIA, NVC at +2 times and NVDL at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NVC or NVDL?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NVC’s moved at 38% annualized and NVDL’s at 38%, so NVC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NVC or NVDL for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, NVC or NVDL?
NVC charges 0.45% a year and NVDL charges 1.05%, so NVC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, NVC against NVDL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/nvc-vs-nvdl

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.