NFLU vs NFXL: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, NFLU finished 0.5 points from its stated multiple and NFXL 0.5. T-REX 2X LONG NFLX DAILY TARGET ETF and Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X ETF.

−17.7%
NFLU returned, 3 months
−17.1%
NFXL returned, 3 months
−5.3 pts
NFLU from its stated multiple
−4.7 pts
NFXL from its stated multiple
NFLU · 3 months to Sep 30, 20265.3 pts short of its stated multiple
5.3 pts short of its stated multipleNFLU returned −17.7% while 2 times NFLX's move would have been −12.4%NFLX −6.2% ×2 implies−12.4%NFLU returned−17.7%5.3 pts short of its stated multipleNFLU returned −17.7% while 2 times NFLX's move would have been −12.4%NFLX −6.2% ×2 implies−12.4%NFLU returned−17.7%

NFLU returned −17.7% while 2 times NFLX's move would have been −12.4%

NFXL · 3 months to Sep 30, 20264.7 pts short of its stated multiple
4.7 pts short of its stated multipleNFXL returned −17.1% while 2 times NFLX's move would have been −12.4%NFLX −6.2% ×2 implies−12.4%NFXL returned−17.1%4.7 pts short of its stated multipleNFXL returned −17.1% while 2 times NFLX's move would have been −12.4%NFLX −6.2% ×2 implies−12.4%NFXL returned−17.1%

NFXL returned −17.1% while 2 times NFLX's move would have been −12.4%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · NFXL scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowNFLUNFXLNFLUNFXLNFLUNFXL
1 month−27.8%−27.8%−28.3%−28.3%+0.5 pts+0.5 pts
3 months−17.7%−17.1%−12.4%−12.4%−5.3 pts−4.7 pts
6 months−53.8%−52.8%−54.4%−54.4%+0.5 pts+1.5 pts
1 year−74.2%−73.5%−83.9%−83.9%+9.7 pts+10.4 pts
Since launch
NFLU Sep 2024 · NFXL Oct 2024
−40.6%−38.6%−3.3%−3.1%−37.4 pts−35.5 pts

NFLU and NFXL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NFLU
T-REX 2X LONG NFLX DAILY TARGET ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Netflix (NFLX)
NFXL
Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Netflix (NFLX)
Issuer T-REX Direxion
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset NFLX NFLX
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −17.7% −17.1%
Underlying returned, over that window −6.2% −6.2%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −12.4% −12.4%
Difference from stated, over that window −5.3 pts −4.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −74.2% −73.5%
Difference from stated, over that window +9.7 pts +10.4 pts
Underlying volatility 36% 36%
Difference over the days both have traded +0.5 pts +0.5 pts
Expense ratio 1.05% 1.05%
Launched Sep 27, 2024 Oct 3, 2024
Net assets $25m $131m

NFLU and NFXL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NFLU in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: NFLU returned −17.7% where its own daily promise gave −14.9%, 2.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times NFLX's −6.2% implies −12.4%, which makes NFLU look 5.3 points short. 2.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NFLU aims to return +2 times NFLX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NFLX moved at 36% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NFXL in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: NFXL returned −17.1% where its own daily promise gave −14.9%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times NFLX's −6.2% implies −12.4%, which makes NFXL look 4.7 points short. NFXL aims to return +2 times NFLX's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NFLU or NFXL?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, NFLU finished 5.3 points from what its multiple implies and NFXL finished 4.7 points from its own, so NFXL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NFLU and NFXL levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Netflix, NFLU at +2 times and NFXL at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NFLU or NFXL?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NFLU’s moved at 36% annualized and NFXL’s at 36%, so NFLU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NFLU or NFXL for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, NFLU or NFXL?
NFLU charges 1.05% a year and NFXL charges 1.05%, so NFLU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, NFLU against NFXL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/nflu-vs-nfxl

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.