MYY vs MZZ: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, MYY finished 1.6 points over and MZZ 2.9 points over. ProShares Short MidCap400 and ProShares UltraShort MidCap400.

+7.1%
MYY returned, 3 months
+13.8%
MZZ returned, 3 months
+1.6 pts
MYY from its stated multiple
+2.7 pts
MZZ from its stated multiple
MYY · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.6 pts ahead of its stated multiple
1.6 pts ahead of its stated multipleMYY returned +7.1% while −1 times MDY's move would have been +5.6%MDY −5.6% ×−1 implies+5.6%MYY returned+7.1%1.6 pts ahead of its stated multipleMYY returned +7.1% while −1 times MDY's move would have been +5.6%MDY −5.6% ×−1 implies+5.6%MYY returned+7.1%

MYY returned +7.1% while −1 times MDY's move would have been +5.6%

MZZ · 3 months to Sep 30, 20262.7 pts ahead of its stated multiple
2.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleMZZ returned +13.8% while −2 times MDY's move would have been +11.1%MDY −5.6% ×−2 implies+11.1%MZZ returned+13.8%2.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleMZZ returned +13.8% while −2 times MDY's move would have been +11.1%MDY −5.6% ×−2 implies+11.1%MZZ returned+13.8%

MZZ returned +13.8% while −2 times MDY's move would have been +11.1%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · MZZ scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowMYYMZZMYYMZZMYYMZZ
1 month+4.7%+9.5%+4.2%+8.4%+0.5 pts+1.1 pts
3 months+7.1%+13.8%+5.6%+11.1%+1.6 pts+2.7 pts
6 months−4.0%−9.5%−6.1%−12.3%+2.1 pts+2.8 pts
1 year−6.9%−17.0%−11.4%−22.8%+4.5 pts+5.8 pts
3 years−24.4%−51.9%−49.0%−98.0%+24.6 pts+46.1 pts
Since launch
MYY Jan 2010 · MZZ Jan 2010
−89.0%−99.4%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

MYY and MZZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400 · Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of the S&P MidCap 400
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of the S&P MidCap 400
Issuer ProShares ProShares
Sets out to return -1x -2x
Underlying asset MDY MDY
Segment us mid cap us mid cap
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +7.1% +13.8%
Underlying returned, over that window −5.6% −5.6%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +5.6% +11.1%
Difference from stated, over that window +1.6 pts +2.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −6.9% −17.0%
Difference from stated, over that window +4.5 pts +5.8 pts
Underlying volatility 12% 12%
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.95%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Jan 4, 2010
Net assets $4m $5m

MYY and MZZ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MYY in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: MYY returned +7.1% where its own daily promise gave +5.5%, 1.6 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times MDY's −5.6% implies +5.6%, which makes MYY look 1.6 points over. 0.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MYY aims to return -1 times MDY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. MDY moved at 12% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

MZZ in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: MZZ returned +13.8% where its own daily promise gave +11.0%, 2.9 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times MDY's −5.6% implies +11.1%, which makes MZZ look 2.7 points over. 0.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MZZ aims to return -2 times MDY's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, MYY or MZZ?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, MYY finished 1.6 points from what its multiple implies and MZZ finished 2.7 points from its own, so MYY came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are MYY and MZZ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the S&P MidCap 400, MYY at -1 times and MZZ at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, MYY or MZZ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window MYY’s moved at 12% annualized and MZZ’s at 12%, so MYY has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold MYY or MZZ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, MYY or MZZ?
MYY charges 0.95% a year and MZZ charges 0.95%, so MYY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, MYY against MZZ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/myy-vs-mzz

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.