MIDU vs UMDD: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, MIDU finished 2.1 points from its stated multiple and UMDD 1.5. Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X ETF and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400.

−18.8%
MIDU returned, 3 months
−18.2%
UMDD returned, 3 months
−2.1 pts
MIDU from its stated multiple
−1.5 pts
UMDD from its stated multiple
MIDU · 3 months to Sep 30, 20262.1 pts short of its stated multiple
2.1 pts short of its stated multipleMIDU returned −18.8% while 3 times MDY's move would have been −16.7%MDY −5.6% ×3 implies−16.7%MIDU returned−18.8%2.1 pts short of its stated multipleMIDU returned −18.8% while 3 times MDY's move would have been −16.7%MDY −5.6% ×3 implies−16.7%MIDU returned−18.8%

MIDU returned −18.8% while 3 times MDY's move would have been −16.7%

UMDD · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.5 pts short of its stated multiple
1.5 pts short of its stated multipleUMDD returned −18.2% while 3 times MDY's move would have been −16.7%MDY −5.6% ×3 implies−16.7%UMDD returned−18.2%1.5 pts short of its stated multipleUMDD returned −18.2% while 3 times MDY's move would have been −16.7%MDY −5.6% ×3 implies−16.7%UMDD returned−18.2%

UMDD returned −18.2% while 3 times MDY's move would have been −16.7%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · UMDD scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowMIDUUMDDMIDUUMDDMIDUUMDD
1 month−13.3%−12.9%−12.6%−12.6%−0.7 pts−0.3 pts
3 months−18.8%−18.2%−16.7%−16.7%−2.1 pts−1.5 pts
6 months+11.2%+11.4%+18.4%+18.4%−7.2 pts−7.0 pts
1 year+17.3%+17.9%+34.2%+34.2%−16.9 pts−16.3 pts
3 years+79.8%+79.0%+146.9%+146.9%−67.1 pts−68.0 pts
Since launch
MIDU Jan 2010 · UMDD Feb 2010
+1229.4%+1401.8%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

MIDU and UMDD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X ETF · Aims to return three times the daily move of the S&P MidCap 400
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 · Aims to return three times the daily move of the S&P MidCap 400
Issuer Direxion ProShares
Sets out to return +3x +3x
Underlying asset MDY MDY
Segment us mid cap us mid cap
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −18.8% −18.2%
Underlying returned, over that window −5.6% −5.6%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −16.7% −16.7%
Difference from stated, over that window −2.1 pts −1.5 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +17.3% +17.9%
Difference from stated, over that window −16.9 pts −16.3 pts
Underlying volatility 12% 12%
Difference over the days both have traded −2.1 pts −1.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.98% 0.95%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Feb 11, 2010
Net assets $59m $26m

MIDU and UMDD on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MIDU in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: MIDU returned −18.8% where its own daily promise gave −16.6%, 2.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 3 times MDY's −5.6% implies −16.7%, which makes MIDU look 2.1 points short. 0.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MIDU aims to return +3 times MDY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. MDY moved at 12% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

UMDD in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: UMDD returned −18.2% where its own daily promise gave −16.6%, 1.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 3 times MDY's −5.6% implies −16.7%, which makes UMDD look 1.5 points short. UMDD aims to return +3 times MDY's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, MIDU or UMDD?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, MIDU finished 2.1 points from what its multiple implies and UMDD finished 1.5 points from its own, so UMDD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are MIDU and UMDD levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the S&P MidCap 400, MIDU at +3 times and UMDD at +3 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, MIDU or UMDD?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window MIDU’s moved at 12% annualized and UMDD’s at 12%, so MIDU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold MIDU or UMDD for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, MIDU or UMDD?
MIDU charges 0.98% a year and UMDD charges 0.95%, so UMDD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, MIDU against UMDD, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/midu-vs-umdd

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.