Which came closer to its stated multiple, LRCC or LRCU?

Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, LRCC finished 2.7 points from what its multiple implies and LRCU finished 7.5 points from its own, so LRCC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.

Are LRCC and LRCU levered on the same thing?

Yes. Both are levered on Lam Research, LRCC at +2 times and LRCU at +2 times the daily move.

Which one decays faster, LRCC or LRCU?

Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window LRCC’s moved at 56% annualized and LRCU’s at 71%, so LRCU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.

Can I hold LRCC or LRCU for a year?

Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Which is cheaper, LRCC or LRCU?

LRCC charges 0.45% a year and LRCU charges 1.30%, so LRCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

LRCC vs LRCU: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, LRCC finished 2.7 points from its stated multiple and LRCU 2.8. Corgi LRCX 2x Daily ETF and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF.

−9.7%

LRCC returned, since launch

−39.4%

LRCU returned, 3 months

−11.4 pts

LRCC from its stated multiple

−7.5 pts

LRCU from its stated multiple

LRCC · 1 month to Sep 30, 20262.7 pts short of its stated multiple

LRCC returned +15.4% while 2 times LRCX's move would have been +18.2%

LRCU · 3 months to Sep 30, 20267.5 pts short of its stated multiple

LRCU returned −39.4% while 2 times LRCX's move would have been −31.9%

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Multiple would give		Difference
Window	LRCC	LRCU	LRCC	LRCU	LRCC	LRCU
1 month	+15.4%	+15.3%	+18.2%	+18.2%	−2.7 pts	−2.8 pts
3 months	not published	−39.4%	not published	−31.9%	not published	−7.5 pts
6 months	not published	+63.9%	not published	+96.5%	not published	−32.6 pts
1 year	not published	+267.1%	not published	not meaningful	not published	not meaningful
Since launch LRCC Jul 2026 · LRCU Aug 2025	−9.7%	+539.5%	+1.7%	not meaningful	−11.4 pts	not meaningful

LRCC and LRCU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

LRCC

Corgi LRCX 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Lam Research (LRCX)

LRCU

Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Lam Research (LRCX)

Issuer Corgi Tradr

Sets out to return +2x +2x

Underlying asset LRCX LRCX

Segment company company

Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +15.4% −39.4%

Underlying returned, over that window +9.1% −15.9%

What the stated multiple implies, over that window +18.2% −31.9%

Difference from stated, over that window −2.7 pts −7.5 pts

Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −9.7% +267.1%

Difference from stated, over that window −11.4 pts not available

Underlying volatility 56% 71%

Difference over the days both have traded −2.7 pts −2.8 pts

Expense ratio 0.45% 1.30%

Launched Jul 7, 2026 Aug 19, 2025

Net assets $767,683 $46m

LRCC and LRCU on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

LRCC in plain words

One month to Sep 30, 2026: LRCC returned +15.4% where its own daily promise gave +15.8%, 0.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times LRCX's 9.1% implies +18.2%, which makes LRCC look 2.7 points short. 2.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. LRCC aims to return +2 times LRCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. LRCX moved at 56% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

LRCU in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: LRCU returned −39.4% where its own daily promise gave −37.6%, 1.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times LRCX's −15.9% implies −31.9%, which makes LRCU look 7.5 points short. 5.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. LRCU aims to return +2 times LRCX's move each day, then resets. LRCX moved at 71% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, LRCC or LRCU?: Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, LRCC finished 2.7 points from what its multiple implies and LRCU finished 7.5 points from its own, so LRCC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are LRCC and LRCU levered on the same thing?: Yes. Both are levered on Lam Research, LRCC at +2 times and LRCU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, LRCC or LRCU?: Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window LRCC’s moved at 56% annualized and LRCU’s at 71%, so LRCU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold LRCC or LRCU for a year?: Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, LRCC or LRCU?: LRCC charges 0.45% a year and LRCU charges 1.30%, so LRCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

LRCC on its own →LRCU on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

LRCC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LRCC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Corgi website ↗LRCU filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LRCU prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Tradr website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, LRCC against LRCU, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/lrcc-vs-lrcu

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.