LITC vs LITG: which held to its multiple?
Over the days both have traded, LITC finished 5.2 points from its stated multiple and LITG 5.3. Corgi LITE 2x Daily ETF and Leverage Shares 2X Long LITE Daily ETF.
LITC returned +7.2% while 2 times LITE's move would have been +12.4%
LITG returned +7.0% while 2 times LITE's move would have been +12.4%
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | LITC | LITG | LITC | LITG | LITC | LITG |
| 1 month | +7.2% | +7.0% | +12.4% | +12.4% | −5.2 pts | −5.3 pts |
| Since launch LITC Jul 2026 · LITG Aug 2026 | +18.4% | +23.9% | +42.2% | +36.7% | −23.8 pts | −12.9 pts |
LITC and LITG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
LITC and LITG on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LITC in plain words
One month to Sep 30, 2026: LITC returned +7.2% where its own daily promise gave +7.8%, 0.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times LITE's 6.2% implies +12.4%, which makes LITC look 5.2 points short. 4.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. LITC aims to return +2 times LITE's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. LITE moved at 74% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
LITG in plain words
One month to Sep 30, 2026: LITG returned +7.0% where its own daily promise gave +7.8%, 0.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times LITE's 6.2% implies +12.4%, which makes LITG look 5.3 points short. LITG aims to return +2 times LITE's move each day, then resets.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, LITC or LITG?
- Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, LITC finished 5.2 points from what its multiple implies and LITG finished 5.3 points from its own, so LITC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are LITC and LITG levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on Lumentum, LITC at +2 times and LITG at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, LITC or LITG?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window LITC’s moved at 74% annualized and LITG’s at 74%, so LITC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold LITC or LITG for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, LITC against LITG, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/litc-vs-litg
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, LITC against LITG, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/litc-vs-litg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, LITC against LITG, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/litc-vs-litg
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). LITC against LITG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/litc-vs-litg
- Markdown
- [LITC against LITG (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/litc-vs-litg)