KPDD vs PDDL: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, KPDD finished 4.1 points from its stated multiple and PDDL 5.9. KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF and GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF.

−15.2%
KPDD returned, 3 months
−17.0%
PDDL returned, 3 months
−4.1 pts
KPDD from its stated multiple
−5.9 pts
PDDL from its stated multiple
KPDD · 3 months to Sep 30, 20264.1 pts short of its stated multiple
4.1 pts short of its stated multipleKPDD returned −15.2% while 2 times PDD's move would have been −11.1%PDD −5.5% ×2 implies−11.1%KPDD returned−15.2%4.1 pts short of its stated multipleKPDD returned −15.2% while 2 times PDD's move would have been −11.1%PDD −5.5% ×2 implies−11.1%KPDD returned−15.2%

KPDD returned −15.2% while 2 times PDD's move would have been −11.1%

PDDL · 3 months to Sep 30, 20265.9 pts short of its stated multiple
5.9 pts short of its stated multiplePDDL returned −17.0% while 2 times PDD's move would have been −11.1%PDD −5.5% ×2 implies−11.1%PDDL returned−17.0%5.9 pts short of its stated multiplePDDL returned −17.0% while 2 times PDD's move would have been −11.1%PDD −5.5% ×2 implies−11.1%PDDL returned−17.0%

PDDL returned −17.0% while 2 times PDD's move would have been −11.1%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · KPDD scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowKPDDPDDLKPDDPDDLKPDDPDDL
1 month−15.4%−16.0%−14.4%−14.4%−1.0 pts−1.6 pts
3 months−15.2%−17.0%−11.1%−11.1%−4.1 pts−5.9 pts
6 months−48.4%−50.3%−46.8%−46.8%−1.6 pts−3.4 pts
1 year−72.9%−73.2%−82.1%−82.1%+9.2 pts+8.8 pts
Since launch
KPDD Mar 2025 · PDDL Jul 2025
−71.1%−59.1%−67.7%−51.6%−3.3 pts−7.5 pts

KPDD and PDDL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

KPDD
KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of PDD
PDDL
GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of PDD
Issuer KraneShares GraniteShares
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset PDD PDD
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −15.2% −17.0%
Underlying returned, over that window −5.5% −5.5%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −11.1% −11.1%
Difference from stated, over that window −4.1 pts −5.9 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −72.9% −73.2%
Difference from stated, over that window +9.2 pts +8.8 pts
Underlying volatility 27% 27%
Difference over the days both have traded −4.1 pts −5.9 pts
Expense ratio 1.26% 1.50%
Launched Mar 12, 2025 Jul 15, 2025
Net assets $14m $6m

KPDD and PDDL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

KPDD in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: KPDD returned −15.2% where its own daily promise gave −12.4%, 2.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times PDD's −5.5% implies −11.1%, which makes KPDD look 4.1 points short. 1.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. KPDD aims to return +2 times PDD's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. PDD moved at 27% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

PDDL in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: PDDL returned −17.0% where its own daily promise gave −12.4%, 4.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times PDD's −5.5% implies −11.1%, which makes PDDL look 5.9 points short. PDDL aims to return +2 times PDD's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, KPDD or PDDL?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, KPDD finished 4.1 points from what its multiple implies and PDDL finished 5.9 points from its own, so KPDD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are KPDD and PDDL levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on PDD, KPDD at +2 times and PDDL at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, KPDD or PDDL?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window KPDD’s moved at 27% annualized and PDDL’s at 27%, so KPDD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold KPDD or PDDL for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, KPDD or PDDL?
KPDD charges 1.26% a year and PDDL charges 1.50%, so KPDD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, KPDD against PDDL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/kpdd-vs-pddl

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.