GGLL vs GOOX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, GGLL finished 1.5 points from its stated multiple and GOOX 1.4. Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X ETF and T-REX 2X LONG ALPHABET DAILY TARGET ETF.

−14.0%
GGLL returned, 3 months
−14.1%
GOOX returned, 3 months
−4.6 pts
GGLL from its stated multiple
−4.7 pts
GOOX from its stated multiple
GGLL · 3 months to Sep 30, 20264.6 pts short of its stated multiple
4.6 pts short of its stated multipleGGLL returned −14.0% while 2 times GOOGL's move would have been −9.4%GOOGL −4.7% ×2 implies−9.4%GGLL returned−14.0%4.6 pts short of its stated multipleGGLL returned −14.0% while 2 times GOOGL's move would have been −9.4%GOOGL −4.7% ×2 implies−9.4%GGLL returned−14.0%

GGLL returned −14.0% while 2 times GOOGL's move would have been −9.4%

GOOX · 3 months to Sep 30, 20264.7 pts short of its stated multiple
4.7 pts short of its stated multipleGOOX returned −14.1% while 2 times GOOGL's move would have been −9.4%GOOGL −4.7% ×2 implies−9.4%GOOX returned−14.1%4.7 pts short of its stated multipleGOOX returned −14.1% while 2 times GOOGL's move would have been −9.4%GOOGL −4.7% ×2 implies−9.4%GOOX returned−14.1%

GOOX returned −14.1% while 2 times GOOGL's move would have been −9.4%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · GGLL scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowGGLLGOOXGGLLGOOXGGLLGOOX
1 month+1.4%+1.5%+2.9%+2.9%−1.5 pts−1.4 pts
3 months−14.0%−14.1%−9.4%−9.4%−4.6 pts−4.7 pts
6 months+20.5%+19.0%+31.7%+31.7%−11.2 pts−12.7 pts
1 year+65.4%+59.7%+83.8%+83.8%−18.4 pts−24.1 pts
3 years+274.5%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningfulnot published
Since launch
GGLL Sep 2022 · GOOX Jan 2024
+337.4%+227.6%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

GGLL and GOOX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Alphabet (GOOGL)
GOOX
T-REX 2X LONG ALPHABET DAILY TARGET ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Alphabet (GOOGL)
Issuer Direxion T-REX
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset GOOGL GOOGL
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −14.0% −14.1%
Underlying returned, over that window −4.7% −4.7%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −9.4% −9.4%
Difference from stated, over that window −4.6 pts −4.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +65.4% +59.7%
Difference from stated, over that window −18.4 pts −24.1 pts
Underlying volatility 34% 34%
Difference over the days both have traded −1.5 pts −1.4 pts
Expense ratio 0.96% 1.05%
Launched Sep 7, 2022 Jan 11, 2024
Net assets $1.1bn $63m

GGLL and GOOX on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

GGLL in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: GGLL returned −14.0% where its own daily promise gave −11.7%, 2.3 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times GOOGL's −4.7% implies −9.4%, which makes GGLL look 4.6 points short. 2.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. GGLL aims to return +2 times GOOGL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. GOOGL moved at 34% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

GOOX in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: GOOX returned −14.1% where its own daily promise gave −11.7%, 2.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times GOOGL's −4.7% implies −9.4%, which makes GOOX look 4.7 points short. GOOX aims to return +2 times GOOGL's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, GGLL or GOOX?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, GGLL finished 4.6 points from what its multiple implies and GOOX finished 4.7 points from its own, so GGLL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are GGLL and GOOX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Alphabet, GGLL at +2 times and GOOX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, GGLL or GOOX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window GGLL’s moved at 34% annualized and GOOX’s at 34%, so GGLL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold GGLL or GOOX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, GGLL or GOOX?
GGLL charges 0.96% a year and GOOX charges 1.05%, so GGLL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, GGLL against GOOX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/ggll-vs-goox

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.