ETHD vs SETH: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, ETHD finished 0.3 points over and SETH 1.0 points over. ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF and ProShares Short Ether ETF.

−69.5%
ETHD returned, 3 months
−42.0%
SETH returned, 3 months
+60.5 pts
ETHD from its stated multiple
+23.0 pts
SETH from its stated multiple
ETHD · 3 months to Sep 30, 202660.5 pts ahead of its stated multiple
60.5 pts ahead of its stated multipleETHD returned −69.5% while −2 times ETHA's move would have been −130.1%ETHA +65.0% ×−2 implies−130.1%ETHD returned−69.5%60.5 pts ahead of its stated multipleETHD returned −69.5% while −2 times ETHA's move would have been −130.1%ETHA +65.0% ×−2 implies−130.1%ETHD returned−69.5%

ETHD returned −69.5% while −2 times ETHA's move would have been −130.1%

SETH · 3 months to Sep 30, 202623 pts ahead of its stated multiple
23 pts ahead of its stated multipleSETH returned −42.0% while −1 times ETHA's move would have been −65.0%ETHA +65.0% ×−1 implies−65.0%SETH returned−42.0%23 pts ahead of its stated multipleSETH returned −42.0% while −1 times ETHA's move would have been −65.0%ETHA +65.0% ×−1 implies−65.0%SETH returned−42.0%

SETH returned −42.0% while −1 times ETHA's move would have been −65.0%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · SETH scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowETHDSETHETHDSETHETHDSETH
1 month−17.6%−7.9%−15.0%−7.5%−2.6 pts−0.4 pts
3 months−69.5%−42.0%−130.1%−65.0%+60.5 pts+23.0 pts
6 months−55.3%−27.0%−49.0%−24.5%−6.3 pts−2.5 pts
1 year−24.9%+10.2%+72.3%+36.1%−97.2 pts−25.9 pts
Since launch
ETHD Jul 2024 · SETH Jul 2024
−91.5%−46.1%+46.6%+23.3%−138.1 pts−69.4 pts

ETHD and SETH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ETHD
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of ether (ETHA)
SETH
ProShares Short Ether ETF · Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of ether (ETHA)
Issuer ProShares ProShares
Sets out to return -2x -1x
Underlying asset ETHA ETHA
Segment crypto crypto
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −69.5% −42.0%
Underlying returned, over that window +65.0% +65.0%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −130.1% −65.0%
Difference from stated, over that window +60.5 pts +23.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −24.9% +10.2%
Difference from stated, over that window −97.2 pts −25.9 pts
Underlying volatility 48% 48%
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.95%
Launched Jun 7, 2024 Nov 2, 2023
Net assets $59m $9m

ETHD and SETH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ETHD in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: ETHD returned −69.5% where its own daily promise gave −69.8%, 0.3 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times ETHA's 65.0% implies −130.1%, which makes ETHD look 60.5 points over. 60.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ETHD aims to return -2 times ETHA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. ETHA moved at 48% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SETH in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SETH returned −42.0% where its own daily promise gave −43.1%, 1.0 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times ETHA's 65.0% implies −65.0%, which makes SETH look 23.0 points over. 22.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SETH aims to return -1 times ETHA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, ETHD or SETH?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, ETHD finished 60.5 points from what its multiple implies and SETH finished 23.0 points from its own, so SETH came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are ETHD and SETH levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on ether, ETHD at -2 times and SETH at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, ETHD or SETH?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window ETHD’s moved at 48% annualized and SETH’s at 48%, so ETHD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold ETHD or SETH for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, ETHD or SETH?
ETHD charges 0.95% a year and SETH charges 0.95%, so ETHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ETHD against SETH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/ethd-vs-seth

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.