EO vs EOSU: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, EO finished 12.8 points from its stated multiple and EOSU 11.7. Corgi EOSE 2x Daily ETF and T-REX 2X LONG EOSE DAILY TARGET ETF.

−76.8%
EO returned, 3 months
−77.9%
EOSU returned, 3 months
+12.8 pts
EO from its stated multiple
+11.7 pts
EOSU from its stated multiple
EO · 3 months to Sep 30, 202612.8 pts ahead of its stated multiple
12.8 pts ahead of its stated multipleEO returned −76.8% while 2 times EOSE's move would have been −89.5%EOSE −44.8% ×2 implies−89.5%EO returned−76.8%12.8 pts ahead of its stated multipleEO returned −76.8% while 2 times EOSE's move would have been −89.5%EOSE −44.8% ×2 implies−89.5%EO returned−76.8%

EO returned −76.8% while 2 times EOSE's move would have been −89.5%

EOSU · 3 months to Sep 30, 202611.7 pts ahead of its stated multiple
11.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleEOSU returned −77.9% while 2 times EOSE's move would have been −89.5%EOSE −44.8% ×2 implies−89.5%EOSU returned−77.9%11.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleEOSU returned −77.9% while 2 times EOSE's move would have been −89.5%EOSE −44.8% ×2 implies−89.5%EOSU returned−77.9%

EOSU returned −77.9% while 2 times EOSE's move would have been −89.5%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · EO scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowEOEOSUEOEOSUEOEOSU
1 month−17.3%−19.6%−9.6%−9.6%−7.7 pts−10.0 pts
3 months−76.8%−77.9%−89.5%−89.5%+12.8 pts+11.7 pts
6 monthsnot published−80.9%not published−77.2%not published−3.7 pts
Since launch
EO Jun 2026 · EOSU Jan 2026
−78.9%−99.3%−95.7%−164.6%+16.8 pts+65.2 pts

EO and EOSU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

EO
Corgi EOSE 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE)
EOSU
T-REX 2X LONG EOSE DAILY TARGET ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE)
Issuer Corgi T-REX
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset EOSE EOSE
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −76.8% −77.9%
Underlying returned, over that window −44.8% −44.8%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −89.5% −89.5%
Difference from stated, over that window +12.8 pts +11.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −78.9% −99.3%
Difference from stated, over that window +16.8 pts +65.2 pts
Underlying volatility 103% 103%
Difference over the days both have traded +12.8 pts +11.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.45% 1.50%
Launched Jun 30, 2026 Jan 14, 2026
Net assets $96,707 $8m

EO and EOSU on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

EO in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: EO returned −76.8% where its own daily promise gave −76.5%, 0.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times EOSE's −44.8% implies −89.5%, which makes EO look 12.8 points over. 13.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EO aims to return +2 times EOSE's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. EOSE moved at 103% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

EOSU in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: EOSU returned −77.9% where its own daily promise gave −76.5%, 1.3 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times EOSE's −44.8% implies −89.5%, which makes EOSU look 11.7 points over. EOSU aims to return +2 times EOSE's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, EO or EOSU?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, EO finished 12.8 points from what its multiple implies and EOSU finished 11.7 points from its own, so EOSU came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are EO and EOSU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Eos Energy Enterprises, EO at +2 times and EOSU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, EO or EOSU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window EO’s moved at 103% annualized and EOSU’s at 103%, so EO has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold EO or EOSU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, EO or EOSU?
EO charges 0.45% a year and EOSU charges 1.50%, so EO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, EO against EOSU, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/eo-vs-eosu

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.