EEV vs EUM: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, EEV finished 1.9 points over and EUM 1.4 points over. ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets and ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets.

−3.3%
EEV returned, 3 months
−0.5%
EUM returned, 3 months
−2.4 pts
EEV from its stated multiple
0.0 pts
EUM from its stated multiple
EEV · 3 months to Sep 30, 20262.4 pts short of its stated multiple
2.4 pts short of its stated multipleEEV returned −3.3% while −2 times EEM's move would have been −0.9%EEM +0.5% ×−2 implies−0.9%EEV returned−3.3%2.4 pts short of its stated multipleEEV returned −3.3% while −2 times EEM's move would have been −0.9%EEM +0.5% ×−2 implies−0.9%EEV returned−3.3%

EEV returned −3.3% while −2 times EEM's move would have been −0.9%

EUM · 3 months to Sep 30, 2026On its stated multiple
On its stated multipleEUM returned −0.5% while −1 times EEM's move would have been −0.5%EEM +0.5% ×−1 implies−0.5%EUM returned−0.5%On its stated multipleEUM returned −0.5% while −1 times EEM's move would have been −0.5%EEM +0.5% ×−1 implies−0.5%EUM returned−0.5%

EUM returned −0.5% while −1 times EEM's move would have been −0.5%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · EEV scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowEEVEUMEEVEUMEEVEUM
1 month+0.3%+0.5%+0.7%+0.3%−0.4 pts+0.1 pts
3 months−3.3%−0.5%−0.9%−0.5%−2.4 pts0.0 pts
6 months−33.4%−16.0%−34.6%−17.3%+1.2 pts+1.3 pts
1 year−44.9%−22.3%−55.0%−27.5%+10.1 pts+5.2 pts
3 years−73.3%−42.5%−178.1%−89.1%+104.8 pts+46.6 pts
Since launch
EEV Jan 2010 · EUM Jan 2010
−97.5%−75.3%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

EEV and EUM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of emerging markets (EEM)
EUM
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets · Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of emerging markets (EEM)
Issuer ProShares ProShares
Sets out to return -2x -1x
Underlying asset EEM EEM
Segment country country
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −3.3% −0.5%
Underlying returned, over that window +0.5% +0.5%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −0.9% −0.5%
Difference from stated, over that window −2.4 pts 0.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −44.9% −22.3%
Difference from stated, over that window +10.1 pts +5.2 pts
Underlying volatility 24% 24%
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.95%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Jan 4, 2010
Net assets $3m $14m

EEV and EUM on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

EEV in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: EEV returned −3.3% where its own daily promise gave −5.2%, 1.9 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times EEM's 0.5% implies −0.9%, which makes EEV look 2.4 points short. 4.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EEV aims to return -2 times EEM's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. EEM moved at 24% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

EUM in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: EUM returned −0.5% where its own daily promise gave −1.9%, 1.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times EEM's 0.5% implies −0.5%, which makes EUM look 0.0 points over. 1.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EUM aims to return -1 times EEM's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, EEV or EUM?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, EEV finished 2.4 points from what its multiple implies and EUM finished 0.0 points from its own, so EUM came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are EEV and EUM levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on emerging markets, EEV at -2 times and EUM at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, EEV or EUM?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window EEV’s moved at 24% annualized and EUM’s at 24%, so EEV has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold EEV or EUM for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, EEV or EUM?
EEV charges 0.95% a year and EUM charges 0.95%, so EEV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, EEV against EUM, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/eev-vs-eum

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.