DRN vs URE: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, DRN finished 1.6 points short and URE 0.8 points short. Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF and ProShares Ultra Real Estate.

−21.6%
DRN returned, 3 months
−14.3%
URE returned, 3 months
−1.3 pts
DRN from its stated multiple
−0.7 pts
URE from its stated multiple
DRN · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.3 pts short of its stated multiple
1.3 pts short of its stated multipleDRN returned −21.6% while 3 times IYR's move would have been −20.3%IYR −6.8% ×3 implies−20.3%DRN returned−21.6%1.3 pts short of its stated multipleDRN returned −21.6% while 3 times IYR's move would have been −20.3%IYR −6.8% ×3 implies−20.3%DRN returned−21.6%

DRN returned −21.6% while 3 times IYR's move would have been −20.3%

URE · 3 months to Sep 30, 20260.7 pts short of its stated multiple
0.7 pts short of its stated multipleURE returned −14.3% while 2 times IYR's move would have been −13.6%IYR −6.8% ×2 implies−13.6%URE returned−14.3%0.7 pts short of its stated multipleURE returned −14.3% while 2 times IYR's move would have been −13.6%IYR −6.8% ×2 implies−13.6%URE returned−14.3%

URE returned −14.3% while 2 times IYR's move would have been −13.6%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · URE scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowDRNUREDRNUREDRNURE
1 month−19.3%−13.0%−20.1%−13.4%+0.8 pts+0.4 pts
3 months−21.6%−14.3%−20.3%−13.6%−1.3 pts−0.7 pts
6 months−3.1%−0.6%+4.2%+2.8%−7.4 pts−3.4 pts
1 year−13.2%−6.3%+0.9%+0.6%−14.1 pts−7.0 pts
3 years+30.1%+34.5%+92.7%+61.8%−62.5 pts−27.3 pts
Since launch
DRN Jan 2010 · URE Jan 2010
+165.2%+326.6%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

DRN and URE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF · Aims to return three times the daily move of iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR)
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate · Aims to return twice the daily move of iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR)
Issuer Direxion ProShares
Sets out to return +3x +2x
Underlying asset IYR IYR
Segment sector sector
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −21.6% −14.3%
Underlying returned, over that window −6.8% −6.8%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −20.3% −13.6%
Difference from stated, over that window −1.3 pts −0.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −13.2% −6.3%
Difference from stated, over that window −14.1 pts −7.0 pts
Underlying volatility 13% 13%
Expense ratio 0.98% 0.95%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Jan 4, 2010
Net assets $35m $47m

DRN and URE on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

DRN in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: DRN returned −21.6% where its own daily promise gave −20.0%, 1.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 3 times IYR's −6.8% implies −20.3%, which makes DRN look 1.3 points short. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. DRN aims to return +3 times IYR's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. IYR moved at 13% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

URE in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: URE returned −14.3% where its own daily promise gave −13.5%, 0.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times IYR's −6.8% implies −13.6%, which makes URE look 0.7 points short. 0.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. URE aims to return +2 times IYR's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, DRN or URE?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, DRN finished 1.3 points from what its multiple implies and URE finished 0.7 points from its own, so URE came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are DRN and URE levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF, DRN at +3 times and URE at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, DRN or URE?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window DRN’s moved at 13% annualized and URE’s at 13%, so DRN has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold DRN or URE for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, DRN or URE?
DRN charges 0.98% a year and URE charges 0.95%, so URE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, DRN against URE, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/drn-vs-ure

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.