DOG vs DXD: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, DOG finished 1.6 points over and DXD 2.6 points over. ProShares Short Dow30 and ProShares UltraShort Dow30.

+3.6%
DOG returned, 3 months
+6.3%
DXD returned, 3 months
+1.3 pts
DOG from its stated multiple
+1.7 pts
DXD from its stated multiple
DOG · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.3 pts ahead of its stated multiple
1.3 pts ahead of its stated multipleDOG returned +3.6% while −1 times DIA's move would have been +2.3%DIA −2.3% ×−1 implies+2.3%DOG returned+3.6%1.3 pts ahead of its stated multipleDOG returned +3.6% while −1 times DIA's move would have been +2.3%DIA −2.3% ×−1 implies+2.3%DOG returned+3.6%

DOG returned +3.6% while −1 times DIA's move would have been +2.3%

DXD · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.7 pts ahead of its stated multiple
1.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleDXD returned +6.3% while −2 times DIA's move would have been +4.6%DIA −2.3% ×−2 implies+4.6%DXD returned+6.3%1.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleDXD returned +6.3% while −2 times DIA's move would have been +4.6%DIA −2.3% ×−2 implies+4.6%DXD returned+6.3%

DXD returned +6.3% while −2 times DIA's move would have been +4.6%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · DXD scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowDOGDXDDOGDXDDOGDXD
1 month+4.7%+9.2%+4.1%+8.2%+0.6 pts+1.0 pts
3 months+3.6%+6.3%+2.3%+4.6%+1.3 pts+1.7 pts
6 months−7.0%−15.3%−10.0%−20.1%+3.1 pts+4.7 pts
1 year−5.7%−14.8%−11.3%−22.6%+5.6 pts+7.7 pts
3 years−24.5%−52.0%−59.3%−118.6%+34.8 pts+66.6 pts
Since launch
DOG Jan 2010 · DXD Jan 2010
−87.1%−99.0%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

DOG and DXD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

DOG
ProShares Short Dow30 · Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of the Dow 30
DXD
ProShares UltraShort Dow30 · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of the Dow 30
Issuer ProShares ProShares
Sets out to return -1x -2x
Underlying asset DIA DIA
Segment us large cap us large cap
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +3.6% +6.3%
Underlying returned, over that window −2.3% −2.3%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +2.3% +4.6%
Difference from stated, over that window +1.3 pts +1.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −5.7% −14.8%
Difference from stated, over that window +5.6 pts +7.7 pts
Underlying volatility 12% 12%
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.95%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Jan 4, 2010
Net assets $102m $46m

DOG and DXD on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

DOG in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: DOG returned +3.6% where its own daily promise gave +2.0%, 1.6 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times DIA's −2.3% implies +2.3%, which makes DOG look 1.3 points over. 0.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. DOG aims to return -1 times DIA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. DIA moved at 12% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

DXD in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: DXD returned +6.3% where its own daily promise gave +3.7%, 2.6 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times DIA's −2.3% implies +4.6%, which makes DXD look 1.7 points over. 0.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. DXD aims to return -2 times DIA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, DOG or DXD?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, DOG finished 1.3 points from what its multiple implies and DXD finished 1.7 points from its own, so DOG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are DOG and DXD levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the Dow 30, DOG at -1 times and DXD at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, DOG or DXD?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window DOG’s moved at 12% annualized and DXD’s at 12%, so DOG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold DOG or DXD for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, DOG or DXD?
DOG charges 0.95% a year and DXD charges 0.95%, so DOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, DOG against DXD, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/dog-vs-dxd

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.