COIG vs CONL: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, COIG finished 20.1 points from its stated multiple and CONL 19.8. Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF.

+14.0%
COIG returned, 3 months
+14.3%
CONL returned, 3 months
−20.1 pts
COIG from its stated multiple
−19.8 pts
CONL from its stated multiple
COIG · 3 months to Sep 30, 202620.1 pts short of its stated multiple
20.1 pts short of its stated multipleCOIG returned +14.0% while 2 times COIN's move would have been +34.1%COIN +17.1% ×2 implies+34.1%COIG returned+14.0%20.1 pts short of its stated multipleCOIG returned +14.0% while 2 times COIN's move would have been +34.1%COIN +17.1% ×2 implies+34.1%COIG returned+14.0%

COIG returned +14.0% while 2 times COIN's move would have been +34.1%

CONL · 3 months to Sep 30, 202619.8 pts short of its stated multiple
19.8 pts short of its stated multipleCONL returned +14.3% while 2 times COIN's move would have been +34.1%COIN +17.1% ×2 implies+34.1%CONL returned+14.3%19.8 pts short of its stated multipleCONL returned +14.3% while 2 times COIN's move would have been +34.1%COIN +17.1% ×2 implies+34.1%CONL returned+14.3%

CONL returned +14.3% while 2 times COIN's move would have been +34.1%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · CONL scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowCOIGCONLCOIGCONLCOIGCONL
1 month−8.5%−8.2%−1.8%−1.8%−6.7 pts−6.3 pts
3 months+14.0%+14.3%+34.1%+34.1%−20.1 pts−19.8 pts
6 months−17.2%−16.6%+15.5%+15.5%−32.8 pts−32.1 pts
1 year−84.9%−84.7%−89.5%−89.5%+4.6 pts+4.9 pts
3 yearsnot published−43.7%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningful
Since launch
COIG Mar 2025 · CONL Aug 2022
−64.8%−72.7%+3.6%not meaningful−68.4 ptsnot meaningful

COIG and CONL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

COIG
Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Coinbase Global (COIN)
CONL
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Coinbase Global (COIN)
Issuer Leverage Shares GraniteShares
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset COIN COIN
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +14.0% +14.3%
Underlying returned, over that window +17.1% +17.1%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +34.1% +34.1%
Difference from stated, over that window −20.1 pts −19.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −84.9% −84.7%
Difference from stated, over that window +4.6 pts +4.9 pts
Underlying volatility 75% 75%
Difference over the days both have traded −20.1 pts −19.8 pts
Expense ratio 0.78% 1.04%
Launched Mar 14, 2025 Aug 9, 2022
Net assets $11m $549m

COIG and CONL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COIG in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: COIG returned +14.0% where its own daily promise gave +19.5%, 5.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times COIN's 17.1% implies +34.1%, which makes COIG look 20.1 points short. 14.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. COIG aims to return +2 times COIN's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. COIN moved at 75% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

CONL in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: CONL returned +14.3% where its own daily promise gave +19.5%, 5.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times COIN's 17.1% implies +34.1%, which makes CONL look 19.8 points short. CONL aims to return +2 times COIN's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, COIG or CONL?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, COIG finished 20.1 points from what its multiple implies and CONL finished 19.8 points from its own, so CONL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are COIG and CONL levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Coinbase Global, COIG at +2 times and CONL at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, COIG or CONL?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window COIG’s moved at 75% annualized and CONL’s at 75%, so COIG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold COIG or CONL for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, COIG or CONL?
COIG charges 0.78% a year and CONL charges 1.04%, so COIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, COIG against CONL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/coig-vs-conl

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.