BABU vs BABX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, BABU finished 1.3 points from its stated multiple and BABX 0.8. Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF.

+12.0%
BABU returned, 3 months
+12.7%
BABX returned, 3 months
−7.5 pts
BABU from its stated multiple
−6.8 pts
BABX from its stated multiple
BABU · 3 months to Sep 30, 20267.5 pts short of its stated multiple
7.5 pts short of its stated multipleBABU returned +12.0% while 2 times BABA's move would have been +19.5%BABA +9.8% ×2 implies+19.5%BABU returned+12.0%7.5 pts short of its stated multipleBABU returned +12.0% while 2 times BABA's move would have been +19.5%BABA +9.8% ×2 implies+19.5%BABU returned+12.0%

BABU returned +12.0% while 2 times BABA's move would have been +19.5%

BABX · 3 months to Sep 30, 20266.8 pts short of its stated multiple
6.8 pts short of its stated multipleBABX returned +12.7% while 2 times BABA's move would have been +19.5%BABA +9.8% ×2 implies+19.5%BABX returned+12.7%6.8 pts short of its stated multipleBABX returned +12.7% while 2 times BABA's move would have been +19.5%BABA +9.8% ×2 implies+19.5%BABX returned+12.7%

BABX returned +12.7% while 2 times BABA's move would have been +19.5%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · BABX scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowBABUBABXBABUBABXBABUBABX
1 month−12.7%−12.2%−11.4%−11.4%−1.3 pts−0.8 pts
3 months+12.0%+12.7%+19.5%+19.5%−7.5 pts−6.8 pts
6 months−33.5%−32.1%−24.6%−24.6%−8.9 pts−7.6 pts
1 yearnot published−71.4%not published−78.5%not published+7.1 pts
3 yearsnot published−17.9%not published+63.7%not published−81.6 pts
Since launch
BABU Feb 2026 · BABX Dec 2022
−63.6%−37.3%−67.9%+50.2%+4.3 pts−87.5 pts

BABU and BABX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BABU
Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Alibaba Group Holding (BABA)
BABX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Alibaba Group Holding (BABA)
Issuer Direxion GraniteShares
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset BABA BABA
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +12.0% +12.7%
Underlying returned, over that window +9.8% +9.8%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +19.5% +19.5%
Difference from stated, over that window −7.5 pts −6.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −63.6% −71.4%
Difference from stated, over that window +4.3 pts +7.1 pts
Underlying volatility 43% 43%
Difference over the days both have traded −1.3 pts −0.8 pts
Expense ratio 0.97% 1.15%
Launched Feb 11, 2026 Dec 13, 2022
Net assets $7m $110m

BABU and BABX on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BABU in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: BABU returned +12.0% where its own daily promise gave +15.1%, 3.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times BABA's 9.8% implies +19.5%, which makes BABU look 7.5 points short. 4.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. BABU aims to return +2 times BABA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. BABA moved at 43% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

BABX in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: BABX returned +12.7% where its own daily promise gave +15.1%, 2.3 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times BABA's 9.8% implies +19.5%, which makes BABX look 6.8 points short. BABX aims to return +2 times BABA's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, BABU or BABX?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, BABU finished 7.5 points from what its multiple implies and BABX finished 6.8 points from its own, so BABX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are BABU and BABX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Alibaba Group Holding, BABU at +2 times and BABX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, BABU or BABX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window BABU’s moved at 43% annualized and BABX’s at 43%, so BABU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold BABU or BABX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, BABU or BABX?
BABU charges 0.97% a year and BABX charges 1.15%, so BABU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, BABU against BABX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/babu-vs-babx

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.