Which came closer to its stated multiple, BABC or KBAB?

Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, BABC finished 1.0 points from what its multiple implies and KBAB finished 7.1 points from its own, so BABC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.

Are BABC and KBAB levered on the same thing?

Yes. Both are levered on Alibaba Group Holding, BABC at +2 times and KBAB at +2 times the daily move.

Which one decays faster, BABC or KBAB?

Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window BABC’s moved at 28% annualized and KBAB’s at 43%, so KBAB has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.

Can I hold BABC or KBAB for a year?

Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Which is cheaper, BABC or KBAB?

BABC charges 0.45% a year and KBAB charges 0.99%, so BABC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

BABC vs KBAB: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, BABC finished 1.0 points from its stated multiple and KBAB 0.9. Corgi BABA 2x Daily ETF and KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF.

−13.2%

BABC returned, since launch

+12.4%

KBAB returned, 3 months

−4.6 pts

BABC from its stated multiple

−7.1 pts

KBAB from its stated multiple

BABC · 1 month to Sep 30, 20261 pt short of its stated multiple

BABC returned −12.4% while 2 times BABA's move would have been −11.4%

KBAB · 3 months to Sep 30, 20267.1 pts short of its stated multiple

KBAB returned +12.4% while 2 times BABA's move would have been +19.5%

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Multiple would give		Difference
Window	BABC	KBAB	BABC	KBAB	BABC	KBAB
1 month	−12.4%	−12.2%	−11.4%	−11.4%	−1.0 pts	−0.9 pts
3 months	not published	+12.4%	not published	+19.5%	not published	−7.1 pts
6 months	not published	−32.9%	not published	−24.6%	not published	−8.3 pts
1 year	not published	−72.1%	not published	−78.5%	not published	+6.5 pts
Since launch BABC Jul 2026 · KBAB Mar 2025	−13.2%	−59.2%	−8.5%	−39.0%	−4.6 pts	−20.2 pts

BABC and KBAB over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BABC

Corgi BABA 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Alibaba Group Holding (BABA)

KBAB

KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Alibaba Group Holding (BABA)

Issuer Corgi KraneShares

Sets out to return +2x +2x

Underlying asset BABA BABA

Segment company company

Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −12.4% +12.4%

Underlying returned, over that window −5.7% +9.8%

What the stated multiple implies, over that window −11.4% +19.5%

Difference from stated, over that window −1.0 pts −7.1 pts

Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −13.2% −72.1%

Difference from stated, over that window −4.6 pts +6.5 pts

Underlying volatility 28% 43%

Difference over the days both have traded −1.0 pts −0.9 pts

Expense ratio 0.45% 0.99%

Launched Jul 10, 2026 Mar 12, 2025

Net assets $332,126 $3m

BABC and KBAB on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BABC in plain words

One month to Sep 30, 2026: BABC returned −12.4% where its own daily promise gave −11.7%, 0.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times BABA's −5.7% implies −11.4%, which makes BABC look 1.0 points short. 0.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. BABC aims to return +2 times BABA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. BABA moved at 28% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

KBAB in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: KBAB returned +12.4% where its own daily promise gave +15.1%, 2.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times BABA's 9.8% implies +19.5%, which makes KBAB look 7.1 points short. 4.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. KBAB aims to return +2 times BABA's move each day, then resets. BABA moved at 43% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, BABC or KBAB?: Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, BABC finished 1.0 points from what its multiple implies and KBAB finished 7.1 points from its own, so BABC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are BABC and KBAB levered on the same thing?: Yes. Both are levered on Alibaba Group Holding, BABC at +2 times and KBAB at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, BABC or KBAB?: Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window BABC’s moved at 28% annualized and KBAB’s at 43%, so KBAB has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold BABC or KBAB for a year?: Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, BABC or KBAB?: BABC charges 0.45% a year and KBAB charges 0.99%, so BABC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BABC vs BABU BABC vs BABX KBAB vs BABU KBAB vs BABX

BABC on its own →KBAB on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BABC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BABC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Corgi website ↗KBAB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗KBAB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗KraneShares page for KBAB ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BABC against KBAB, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/babc-vs-kbab

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.