AAPB vs IOSX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, AAPB finished 0.7 points from its stated multiple and IOSX 0.9. GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF and Corgi AAPL 2x Daily ETF.

+23.7%
AAPB returned, 3 months
+22.7%
IOSX returned, 3 months
−2.7 pts
AAPB from its stated multiple
−3.7 pts
IOSX from its stated multiple
AAPB · 3 months to Sep 30, 20262.7 pts short of its stated multiple
2.7 pts short of its stated multipleAAPB returned +23.7% while 2 times AAPL's move would have been +26.4%AAPL +13.2% ×2 implies+26.4%AAPB returned+23.7%2.7 pts short of its stated multipleAAPB returned +23.7% while 2 times AAPL's move would have been +26.4%AAPL +13.2% ×2 implies+26.4%AAPB returned+23.7%

AAPB returned +23.7% while 2 times AAPL's move would have been +26.4%

IOSX · 3 months to Sep 30, 20263.7 pts short of its stated multiple
3.7 pts short of its stated multipleIOSX returned +22.7% while 2 times AAPL's move would have been +26.4%AAPL +13.2% ×2 implies+26.4%IOSX returned+22.7%3.7 pts short of its stated multipleIOSX returned +22.7% while 2 times AAPL's move would have been +26.4%AAPL +13.2% ×2 implies+26.4%IOSX returned+22.7%

IOSX returned +22.7% while 2 times AAPL's move would have been +26.4%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · AAPB scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowAAPBIOSXAAPBIOSXAAPBIOSX
1 month+9.5%+9.3%+10.2%+10.2%−0.7 pts−0.9 pts
3 months+23.7%+22.7%+26.4%+26.4%−2.7 pts−3.7 pts
6 months+58.2%not published+61.0%not published−2.9 ptsnot published
1 year+51.5%not published+62.5%not published−11.0 ptsnot published
3 years+135.6%not published+194.2%not published−58.6 ptsnot published
Since launch
AAPB Aug 2022 · IOSX Jun 2026
+115.4%+27.2%not meaningful+30.4%not meaningful−3.2 pts

AAPB and IOSX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

AAPB
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Apple (AAPL)
IOSX
Corgi AAPL 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Apple (AAPL)
Issuer GraniteShares Corgi
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset AAPL AAPL
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +23.7% +22.7%
Underlying returned, over that window +13.2% +13.2%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +26.4% +26.4%
Difference from stated, over that window −2.7 pts −3.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +51.5% +27.2%
Difference from stated, over that window −11.0 pts −3.2 pts
Underlying volatility 28% 28%
Difference over the days both have traded −0.7 pts −0.9 pts
Expense ratio 1.15% 0.45%
Launched Aug 9, 2022 Jun 30, 2026
Net assets $17m $501,176

AAPB and IOSX on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

AAPB in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: AAPB returned +23.7% where its own daily promise gave +25.6%, 1.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times AAPL's 13.2% implies +26.4%, which makes AAPB look 2.7 points short. 0.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AAPB aims to return +2 times AAPL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AAPL moved at 28% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

IOSX in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: IOSX returned +22.7% where its own daily promise gave +25.6%, 2.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times AAPL's 13.2% implies +26.4%, which makes IOSX look 3.7 points short. IOSX aims to return +2 times AAPL's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, AAPB or IOSX?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, AAPB finished 2.7 points from what its multiple implies and IOSX finished 3.7 points from its own, so AAPB came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are AAPB and IOSX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Apple, AAPB at +2 times and IOSX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, AAPB or IOSX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AAPB’s moved at 28% annualized and IOSX’s at 28%, so AAPB has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold AAPB or IOSX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, AAPB or IOSX?
AAPB charges 1.15% a year and IOSX charges 0.45%, so IOSX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, AAPB against IOSX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/aapb-vs-iosx

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.