Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

SNK vs SPCF: which held to its multiple?

Over a month against its own daily promise, SNK finished 0.2 points short and SPCF 1.9 points short.

GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF and ProShares Ultra SpaceX, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−2.6%SNK returned, 3 months
−50.9%SPCF returned, 3 months
−45.5 ptsSNK from its stated multiple
−8.0 ptsSPCF from its stated multiple
SNK4.2 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies−6.9%SNK returned−11.1%SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies−6.9%SNK returned−11.1%
SPCF3.4 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies+6.9%SPCF returned+3.6%SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies+6.9%SPCF returned+3.6%

Performance, window by window

SNK and SPCF over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
SNKSPCFSNKSPCFSNKSPCF
1 month−11.1%+3.6%−6.9%+6.9%−4.2 pts−3.4 pts
Since launch−2.6%−50.9%+42.9%−42.9%−45.5 pts−8.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SNK and SPCF on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SNK
GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
SPCF
ProShares Ultra SpaceX
Aims to return twice the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
IssuerGraniteSharesProShares
Sets out to return-2x+2x
OnSPCXSPCX
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−11.1%+3.6%
Underlying returned, 3 months+3.5%+3.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−6.9%+6.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months−4.2 pts−3.4 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−2.6%−50.9%
Difference from stated, over that window−45.5 pts−8.0 pts
Underlying volatility43%43%
Difference over the days both have traded−4.2 pts−3.4 pts
Expense ratio2.20%0.95%
LaunchedJun 15, 2026Jun 15, 2026

SNK in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: SNK returned −11.1% where its own daily promise gave −10.8%, 0.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies −6.9%, which makes SNK look 4.2 points short. 3.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SNK aims to return -2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPCX moved at 43% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SPCF in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: SPCF returned +3.6% where its own daily promise gave +5.5%, 1.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies +6.9%, which makes SPCF look 3.4 points short. 1.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPCF aims to return +2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SNK or SPCF?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, SNK finished 4.2 points from what its multiple implies and SPCF finished 3.4 points from its own, so SPCF came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SNK and SPCF levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, SNK at -2 times and SPCF at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SNK or SPCF?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SNK’s moved at 43% annualized and SPCF’s at 43%, so SNK has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SNK or SPCF for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SNK or SPCF?
SNK charges 2.20% a year and SPCF charges 0.95%, so SPCF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SNK against SPCF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SNK against SPCF, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/SNK-SPCF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources