Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

SPCF vs SPCG: which held to its multiple?

Over a month against its own daily promise, SPCF finished 1.9 points short and SPCG 0.5 points over.

ProShares Ultra SpaceX and Tradr 2X Short SpaceX Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−50.9%SPCF returned, 3 months
+0.5%SPCG returned, 3 months
−8.0 ptsSPCF from its stated multiple
−42.4 ptsSPCG from its stated multiple
SPCF3.4 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies+6.9%SPCF returned+3.6%SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies+6.9%SPCF returned+3.6%
SPCG3.5 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies−6.9%SPCG returned−10.4%SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies−6.9%SPCG returned−10.4%

Performance, window by window

SPCF and SPCG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
SPCFSPCGSPCFSPCGSPCFSPCG
1 month+3.6%−10.4%+6.9%−6.9%−3.4 pts−3.5 pts
Since launch−50.9%+0.5%−42.9%+42.9%−8.0 pts−42.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SPCF and SPCG on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPCF
ProShares Ultra SpaceX
Aims to return twice the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
SPCG
Tradr 2X Short SpaceX Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
IssuerProSharesTradr
Sets out to return+2x-2x
OnSPCXSPCX
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+3.6%−10.4%
Underlying returned, 3 months+3.5%+3.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+6.9%−6.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months−3.4 pts−3.5 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−50.9%+0.5%
Difference from stated, over that window−8.0 pts−42.4 pts
Underlying volatility43%43%
Difference over the days both have traded−3.4 pts−3.5 pts
Expense ratio0.95%1.49%
LaunchedJun 15, 2026Jun 15, 2026

SPCF in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: SPCF returned +3.6% where its own daily promise gave +5.5%, 1.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies +6.9%, which makes SPCF look 3.4 points short. 1.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPCF aims to return +2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPCX moved at 43% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SPCG in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: SPCG returned −10.4% where its own daily promise gave −10.8%, 0.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies −6.9%, which makes SPCG look 3.5 points short. 3.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPCG aims to return -2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SPCF or SPCG?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, SPCF finished 3.4 points from what its multiple implies and SPCG finished 3.5 points from its own, so SPCF came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SPCF and SPCG levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, SPCF at +2 times and SPCG at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SPCF or SPCG?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SPCF’s moved at 43% annualized and SPCG’s at 43%, so SPCF has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SPCF or SPCG for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SPCF or SPCG?
SPCF charges 0.95% a year and SPCG charges 1.49%, so SPCF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPCF against SPCG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPCF against SPCG, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/SPCF-SPCG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources