Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

LOFF vs SNK: which held to its multiple?

Over a month against its own daily promise, LOFF finished 1.7 points short and SNK 0.2 points short.

Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF and GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−50.6%LOFF returned, 3 months
−2.6%SNK returned, 3 months
−7.7 ptsLOFF from its stated multiple
−45.5 ptsSNK from its stated multiple
LOFF3.1 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies+6.9%LOFF returned+3.8%SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies+6.9%LOFF returned+3.8%
SNK4.2 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies−6.9%SNK returned−11.1%SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies−6.9%SNK returned−11.1%

Performance, window by window

LOFF and SNK over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
LOFFSNKLOFFSNKLOFFSNK
1 month+3.8%−11.1%+6.9%−6.9%−3.1 pts−4.2 pts
Since launch−50.6%−2.6%−42.9%+42.9%−7.7 pts−45.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
LOFF and SNK on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LOFF
Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
SNK
GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
IssuerDirexionGraniteShares
Sets out to return+2x-2x
OnSPCXSPCX
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+3.8%−11.1%
Underlying returned, 3 months+3.5%+3.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+6.9%−6.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months−3.1 pts−4.2 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−50.6%−2.6%
Difference from stated, over that window−7.7 pts−45.5 pts
Underlying volatility43%43%
Difference over the days both have traded−3.1 pts−4.2 pts
Expense ratio0.97%2.20%
LaunchedJun 15, 2026Jun 15, 2026

LOFF in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: LOFF returned +3.8% where its own daily promise gave +5.5%, 1.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies +6.9%, which makes LOFF look 3.1 points short. 1.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. LOFF aims to return +2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPCX moved at 43% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SNK in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: SNK returned −11.1% where its own daily promise gave −10.8%, 0.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies −6.9%, which makes SNK look 4.2 points short. 3.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SNK aims to return -2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, LOFF or SNK?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, LOFF finished 3.1 points from what its multiple implies and SNK finished 4.2 points from its own, so LOFF came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are LOFF and SNK levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, LOFF at +2 times and SNK at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, LOFF or SNK?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window LOFF’s moved at 43% annualized and SNK’s at 43%, so LOFF has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold LOFF or SNK for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, LOFF or SNK?
LOFF charges 0.97% a year and SNK charges 2.20%, so LOFF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LOFF against SNK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LOFF against SNK, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/LOFF-SNK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources