Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

SNK vs SPCM: which held to its multiple?

Over a month against its own daily promise, SNK finished 0.2 points short and SPCM 0.9 points short.

GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF and Tradr 2X Long SpaceX Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−2.6%SNK returned, 3 months
−49.1%SPCM returned, 3 months
−45.5 ptsSNK from its stated multiple
−6.2 ptsSPCM from its stated multiple
SNK4.2 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies−6.9%SNK returned−11.1%SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies−6.9%SNK returned−11.1%
SPCM2.4 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies+6.9%SPCM returned+4.5%SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies+6.9%SPCM returned+4.5%

Performance, window by window

SNK and SPCM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
SNKSPCMSNKSPCMSNKSPCM
1 month−11.1%+4.5%−6.9%+6.9%−4.2 pts−2.4 pts
Since launch−2.6%−49.1%+42.9%−42.9%−45.5 pts−6.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SNK and SPCM on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SNK
GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
SPCM
Tradr 2X Long SpaceX Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
IssuerGraniteSharesTradr
Sets out to return-2x+2x
OnSPCXSPCX
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−11.1%+4.5%
Underlying returned, 3 months+3.5%+3.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−6.9%+6.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months−4.2 pts−2.4 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−2.6%−49.1%
Difference from stated, over that window−45.5 pts−6.2 pts
Underlying volatility43%43%
Difference over the days both have traded−4.2 pts−2.4 pts
Expense ratio2.20%1.49%
LaunchedJun 15, 2026Jun 15, 2026

SNK in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: SNK returned −11.1% where its own daily promise gave −10.8%, 0.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies −6.9%, which makes SNK look 4.2 points short. 3.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SNK aims to return -2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPCX moved at 43% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SPCM in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: SPCM returned +4.5% where its own daily promise gave +5.5%, 0.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies +6.9%, which makes SPCM look 2.4 points short. 1.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPCM aims to return +2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SNK or SPCM?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, SNK finished 4.2 points from what its multiple implies and SPCM finished 2.4 points from its own, so SPCM came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SNK and SPCM levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, SNK at -2 times and SPCM at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SNK or SPCM?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SNK’s moved at 43% annualized and SPCM’s at 43%, so SNK has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SNK or SPCM for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SNK or SPCM?
SNK charges 2.20% a year and SPCM charges 1.49%, so SPCM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SNK against SPCM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SNK against SPCM, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/SNK-SPCM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources