Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CRCA vs CRCD: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, CRCA finished 5.9 points short and CRCD 0.5 points short.

ProShares Ultra CRCL and T-REX 2X INVERSE CRCL DAILY TARGET ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+4.9%CRCA returned, 3 months
−60.0%CRCD returned, 3 months
−27.8 ptsCRCA from its stated multiple
−27.2 ptsCRCD from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: CRCD scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

CRCA 8.6CRCD 11.20.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CRCA27.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies+32.8%CRCA returned+4.9%CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies+32.8%CRCA returned+4.9%
CRCD27.2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies−32.8%CRCD returned−60.0%CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies−32.8%CRCD returned−60.0%

Performance, window by window

CRCA and CRCD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
CRCACRCDCRCACRCDCRCACRCD
1 month+47.8%−52.7%+54.2%−54.2%−6.4 pts+1.5 pts
3 months+4.9%−60.0%+32.8%−32.8%−27.8 pts−27.2 pts
6 months−66.2%−62.7%−43.0%+43.0%−23.2 pts−105.6 pts
1 year−85.2%not published−64.5%not published−20.7 ptsnot published
Since launch−89.8%−91.3%−81.5%+57.3%−8.3 pts−148.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CRCA and CRCD on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CRCA
ProShares Ultra CRCL
Aims to return twice the daily move of CRCL
CRCD
T-REX 2X INVERSE CRCL DAILY TARGET ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of CRCL
IssuerProSharesT-REX
Sets out to return+2x-2x
OnCRCLCRCL
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+4.9%−60.0%
Underlying returned, 3 months+16.4%+16.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+32.8%−32.8%
Difference from stated, 3 months−27.8 pts−27.2 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−85.2%−91.3%
Difference from stated, over that window−20.7 pts−148.6 pts
Underlying volatility89%89%
Difference over the days both have traded−6.4 ptsno shared window
Expense rationot published1.50%
LaunchedAug 7, 2025Sep 26, 2025

CRCA in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: CRCA returned +4.9% where its own daily promise gave +10.8%, 5.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times CRCL's 16.4% implies +32.8%, which makes CRCA look 27.8 points short. 21.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CRCA aims to return +2 times CRCL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. CRCL moved at 89% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

CRCD in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: CRCD returned −60.0% where its own daily promise gave −59.5%, 0.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times CRCL's 16.4% implies −32.8%, which makes CRCD look 27.2 points short. 26.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CRCD aims to return -2 times CRCL's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, CRCA or CRCD?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, CRCA finished 27.8 points from what its multiple implies and CRCD finished 27.2 points from its own, so CRCD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are CRCA and CRCD levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on CRCL, CRCA at +2 times and CRCD at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, CRCA or CRCD?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window CRCA’s moved at 89% annualized and CRCD’s at 89%, so CRCA has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold CRCA or CRCD for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CRCA against CRCD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CRCA against CRCD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/CRCA-CRCD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources