Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CIR vs CRCA: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, CIR finished 4.5 points from its stated multiple and CRCA 6.4.

Corgi CRCL 2x Daily ETF and ProShares Ultra CRCL, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+67.4%CIR returned, 3 months
+4.9%CRCA returned, 3 months
−10.7 ptsCIR from its stated multiple
−27.8 ptsCRCA from its stated multiple
CIR4.5 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
CRCL +27.1% ×2 implies+54.2%CIR returned+49.7%CRCL +27.1% ×2 implies+54.2%CIR returned+49.7%
CRCA27.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies+32.8%CRCA returned+4.9%CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies+32.8%CRCA returned+4.9%

Performance, window by window

CIR and CRCA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
CIRCRCACIRCRCACIRCRCA
1 month+49.7%+47.8%+54.2%+54.2%−4.5 pts−6.4 pts
3 monthsnot published+4.9%not published+32.8%not published−27.8 pts
6 monthsnot published−66.2%not published−43.0%not published−23.2 pts
1 yearnot published−85.2%not published−64.5%not published−20.7 pts
Since launch+67.4%−89.8%+78.1%−81.5%−10.7 pts−8.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CIR and CRCA on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CIR
Corgi CRCL 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of CRCL
CRCA
ProShares Ultra CRCL
Aims to return twice the daily move of CRCL
IssuerCorgiProShares
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnCRCLCRCL
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+49.7%+4.9%
Underlying returned, 3 months+27.1%+16.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+54.2%+32.8%
Difference from stated, 3 months−4.5 pts−27.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+67.4%−85.2%
Difference from stated, over that window−10.7 pts−20.7 pts
Underlying volatility97%89%
Difference over the days both have traded−4.5 pts−6.4 pts
Expense rationot publishednot published
LaunchedJul 7, 2026Aug 7, 2025

CIR in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: CIR returned +49.7% where its own daily promise gave +50.2%, 0.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times CRCL's 27.1% implies +54.2%, which makes CIR look 4.5 points short. 4.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CIR aims to return +2 times CRCL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. CRCL moved at 97% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

CRCA in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: CRCA returned +4.9% where its own daily promise gave +10.8%, 5.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times CRCL's 16.4% implies +32.8%, which makes CRCA look 27.8 points short. 21.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CRCA aims to return +2 times CRCL's move each day, then resets. CRCL moved at 89% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, CIR or CRCA?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, CIR finished 4.5 points from what its multiple implies and CRCA finished 27.8 points from its own, so CIR came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are CIR and CRCA levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on CRCL, CIR at +2 times and CRCA at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, CIR or CRCA?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window CIR’s moved at 97% annualized and CRCA’s at 89%, so CIR has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold CIR or CRCA for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CIR against CRCA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CIR against CRCA, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/CIR-CRCA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources