Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CCUP vs CRCA: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, CCUP finished 6.3 points from its stated multiple and CRCA 6.4.

T-REX 2X LONG CRCL DAILY TARGET ETF and ProShares Ultra CRCL, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+7.2%CCUP returned, 3 months
+4.9%CRCA returned, 3 months
−25.6 ptsCCUP from its stated multiple
−27.8 ptsCRCA from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: CCUP scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

CCUP 26.7CRCA 8.60.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CCUP25.6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies+32.8%CCUP returned+7.2%CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies+32.8%CCUP returned+7.2%
CRCA27.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies+32.8%CRCA returned+4.9%CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies+32.8%CRCA returned+4.9%

Performance, window by window

CCUP and CRCA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
CCUPCRCACCUPCRCACCUPCRCA
1 month+47.9%+47.8%+54.2%+54.2%−6.3 pts−6.4 pts
3 months+7.2%+4.9%+32.8%+32.8%−25.6 pts−27.8 pts
6 months−64.3%−66.2%−43.0%−43.0%−21.3 pts−23.2 pts
1 year−83.6%−85.2%−64.5%−64.5%−19.1 pts−20.7 pts
Since launch−89.7%−89.8%−87.6%−81.5%−2.1 pts−8.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CCUP and CRCA on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CCUP
T-REX 2X LONG CRCL DAILY TARGET ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of CRCL
CRCA
ProShares Ultra CRCL
Aims to return twice the daily move of CRCL
IssuerT-REXProShares
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnCRCLCRCL
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+7.2%+4.9%
Underlying returned, 3 months+16.4%+16.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+32.8%+32.8%
Difference from stated, 3 months−25.6 pts−27.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−83.6%−85.2%
Difference from stated, over that window−19.1 pts−20.7 pts
Underlying volatility89%89%
Difference over the days both have traded−6.3 pts−6.4 pts
Expense ratio1.50%not published
LaunchedAug 11, 2025Aug 7, 2025

CCUP in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: CCUP returned +7.2% where its own daily promise gave +10.8%, 3.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times CRCL's 16.4% implies +32.8%, which makes CCUP look 25.6 points short. 21.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CCUP aims to return +2 times CRCL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. CRCL moved at 89% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

CRCA in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: CRCA returned +4.9% where its own daily promise gave +10.8%, 5.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times CRCL's 16.4% implies +32.8%, which makes CRCA look 27.8 points short. CRCA aims to return +2 times CRCL's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, CCUP or CRCA?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, CCUP finished 25.6 points from what its multiple implies and CRCA finished 27.8 points from its own, so CCUP came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are CCUP and CRCA levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on CRCL, CCUP at +2 times and CRCA at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, CCUP or CRCA?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window CCUP’s moved at 89% annualized and CRCA’s at 89%, so CCUP has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold CCUP or CRCA for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CCUP against CRCA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CCUP against CRCA, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/CCUP-CRCA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources