Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ASTN vs ASUP: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, ASTN finished 8.6 points short and ASUP 2.2 points short.

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short ASTS ETF and T-REX 2X Long ASTS Daily Target ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−19.4%ASTN returned, 3 months
−60.6%ASUP returned, 3 months
−74.2 ptsASTN from its stated multiple
−5.9 ptsASUP from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: ASUP scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

ASTN 3.7ASUP 63.20.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ASTN74.2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
ASTS −27.4% ×2 implies+54.7%ASTN returned−19.4%ASTS −27.4% ×2 implies+54.7%ASTN returned−19.4%
ASUP5.9 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
ASTS −27.4% ×2 implies−54.7%ASUP returned−60.6%ASTS −27.4% ×2 implies−54.7%ASUP returned−60.6%

Performance, window by window

ASTN and ASUP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
ASTNASUPASTNASUPASTNASUP
1 month+30.6%−38.9%+38.9%−38.9%−8.3 pts0.0 pts
3 months−19.4%−60.6%+54.7%−54.7%−74.2 pts−5.9 pts
6 months−71.7%not published+61.3%not published−133.0 ptsnot published
Since launch−70.7%−75.7%+82.4%−75.6%−153.0 pts−0.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ASTN and ASUP on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ASTN
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short ASTS ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of ASTS
ASUP
T-REX 2X Long ASTS Daily Target ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of ASTS
IssuerDefianceT-REX
Sets out to return-2x+2x
OnASTSASTS
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−19.4%−60.6%
Underlying returned, 3 months−27.4%−27.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+54.7%−54.7%
Difference from stated, 3 months−74.2 pts−5.9 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−70.7%−75.7%
Difference from stated, over that window−153.0 pts−0.1 pts
Underlying volatility98%98%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window0.0 pts
Expense ratio1.31%not published
LaunchedFeb 6, 2026May 21, 2026

ASTN in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: ASTN returned −19.4% where its own daily promise gave −10.8%, 8.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times ASTS's −27.4% implies +54.7%, which makes ASTN look 74.2 points short. 65.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ASTN aims to return -2 times ASTS's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. ASTS moved at 98% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

ASUP in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: ASUP returned −60.6% where its own daily promise gave −58.4%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times ASTS's −27.4% implies −54.7%, which makes ASUP look 5.9 points short. 3.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ASUP aims to return +2 times ASTS's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, ASTN or ASUP?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, ASTN finished 74.2 points from what its multiple implies and ASUP finished 5.9 points from its own, so ASUP came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are ASTN and ASUP levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on ASTS, ASTN at -2 times and ASUP at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, ASTN or ASUP?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window ASTN’s moved at 98% annualized and ASUP’s at 98%, so ASTN has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold ASTN or ASUP for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ASTN against ASUP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ASTN against ASUP, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/ASTN-ASUP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources