Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ASTN vs ASTY: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, ASTN finished 8.6 points short and ASTY 3.6 points short.

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short ASTS ETF and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ASTS ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−19.4%ASTN returned, 3 months
−62.0%ASTY returned, 3 months
−74.2 ptsASTN from its stated multiple
−7.2 ptsASTY from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: ASTY scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

ASTN 3.7ASTY 27.60.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ASTN74.2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
ASTS −27.4% ×2 implies+54.7%ASTN returned−19.4%ASTS −27.4% ×2 implies+54.7%ASTN returned−19.4%
ASTY7.2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
ASTS −27.4% ×2 implies−54.7%ASTY returned−62.0%ASTS −27.4% ×2 implies−54.7%ASTY returned−62.0%

Performance, window by window

ASTN and ASTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
ASTNASTYASTNASTYASTNASTY
1 month+30.6%−39.6%+38.9%−38.9%−8.3 pts−0.7 pts
3 months−19.4%−62.0%+54.7%−54.7%−74.2 pts−7.2 pts
6 months−71.7%not published+61.3%not published−133.0 ptsnot published
Since launch−70.7%−76.0%+82.4%−75.6%−153.0 pts−0.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ASTN and ASTY on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ASTN
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short ASTS ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of ASTS
ASTY
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ASTS ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of ASTS
IssuerDefianceDefiance
Sets out to return-2x+2x
OnASTSASTS
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−19.4%−62.0%
Underlying returned, 3 months−27.4%−27.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+54.7%−54.7%
Difference from stated, 3 months−74.2 pts−7.2 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−70.7%−76.0%
Difference from stated, over that window−153.0 pts−0.4 pts
Underlying volatility98%98%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window−0.7 pts
Expense ratio1.31%1.31%
LaunchedFeb 6, 2026May 21, 2026

ASTN in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: ASTN returned −19.4% where its own daily promise gave −10.8%, 8.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times ASTS's −27.4% implies +54.7%, which makes ASTN look 74.2 points short. 65.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ASTN aims to return -2 times ASTS's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. ASTS moved at 98% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

ASTY in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: ASTY returned −62.0% where its own daily promise gave −58.4%, 3.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times ASTS's −27.4% implies −54.7%, which makes ASTY look 7.2 points short. 3.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ASTY aims to return +2 times ASTS's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, ASTN or ASTY?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, ASTN finished 74.2 points from what its multiple implies and ASTY finished 7.2 points from its own, so ASTY came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are ASTN and ASTY levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on ASTS, ASTN at -2 times and ASTY at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, ASTN or ASTY?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window ASTN’s moved at 98% annualized and ASTY’s at 98%, so ASTN has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold ASTN or ASTY for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, ASTN or ASTY?
ASTN charges 1.31% a year and ASTY charges 1.31%, so ASTN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ASTN against ASTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ASTN against ASTY, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/ASTN-ASTY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources