Data as of .
ASTN vs ASTT: which held to its multiple?
Over a month against its own daily promise, ASTN finished 2.6 points short and ASTT 0.5 points short.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASTN | ASTT | ASTN | ASTT | ASTN | ASTT | |
| 1 month | +30.6% | −38.6% | +38.9% | −38.9% | −8.3 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 3 months | −19.4% | not published | +54.7% | not published | −74.2 pts | not published |
| 6 months | −71.7% | not published | +61.3% | not published | −133.0 pts | not published |
| Since launch | −70.7% | −62.7% | +82.4% | −65.3% | −153.0 pts | +2.6 pts |
| ASTN Defiance Daily Target 2X Short ASTS ETF Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of ASTS | ASTT Corgi ASTS 2x Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of ASTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Defiance | Corgi |
| Sets out to return | -2x | +2x |
| On | ASTS | ASTS |
| Segment | company | company |
| Fund returned, 3 months | −19.4% | −38.6% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | −27.4% | −19.4% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | +54.7% | −38.9% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | −74.2 pts | +0.3 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | −70.7% | −62.7% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | −153.0 pts | +2.6 pts |
| Underlying volatility | 98% | 74% |
| Difference over the days both have traded | no shared window | +0.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 1.31% | 0.45% |
| Launched | Feb 6, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
ASTN in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: ASTN returned −19.4% where its own daily promise gave −10.8%, 8.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times ASTS's −27.4% implies +54.7%, which makes ASTN look 74.2 points short. 65.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ASTN aims to return -2 times ASTS's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. ASTS moved at 98% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
ASTT in plain words
One month to Sep 11, 2026: ASTT returned −38.6% where its own daily promise gave −38.1%, 0.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times ASTS's −19.4% implies −38.9%, which makes ASTT look 0.3 points over. 0.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ASTT aims to return +2 times ASTS's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. ASTS moved at 74% annualized over that window.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, ASTN or ASTT?
- Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, ASTN finished 74.2 points from what its multiple implies and ASTT finished 0.3 points from its own, so ASTT came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are ASTN and ASTT levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on ASTS, ASTN at -2 times and ASTT at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, ASTN or ASTT?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window ASTN’s moved at 98% annualized and ASTT’s at 74%, so ASTN has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold ASTN or ASTT for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
- Which is cheaper, ASTN or ASTT?
- ASTN charges 1.31% a year and ASTT charges 0.45%, so ASTT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ASTN against ASTT, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/ASTN-ASTT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.