Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PCOV vs TPAY: which paid, and which earned it?

PCOV and TPAY both write options for income.

Principal Equity Premium Income ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF.

0.0%PCOV cash paid, 1 year
5.8%TPAY cash paid, 1 year
−3.7%PCOV total return, 1 year
+11.0%TPAY total return, 1 year
PCOV3 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPY
TPAY0.8 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+11.8%TPAY+11.0%5.8% of it arrived as cash0.8 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+11.8%TPAY+11.0%0.8 pts behind SPY

Performance, window by window

PCOV and TPAY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
PCOVTPAYPCOVTPAYPCOVTPAY
3 monthsnot published+1.5%not published2.4%not published−0.8 pts
6 monthsnot published+17.3%not published5.3%not published−0.7 pts
Since launch−3.7%+11.0%0.0%5.8%−3.0 pts−0.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PCOV and TPAY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PCOV
Principal Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY
TPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerPrincipalRoundhill
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualizednot published9.5%
Expense ratio0.34%0.49%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)5.8% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−3.7%+4.9%
Total return, 1 year−3.7% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)+11.0% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year−0.7%+11.8%
Ahead or behind−3.0 pts−0.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age30 days212 days
Net assetsnot published$2m

PCOV in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, PCOV paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −0.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts.

TPAY in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TPAY paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +11.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.5%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, PCOV or TPAY?
PCOV charges 0.34% a year and TPAY charges 0.49%, so PCOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PCOV against TPAY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PCOV against TPAY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pcov-vs-tpay Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources