Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PCOV vs XSPI: which paid, and which earned it?

PCOV and XSPI both write options for income.

Principal Equity Premium Income ETF and NEOS Boosted S&P 500(R) High Income ETF.

0.0%PCOV cash paid, 1 year
11.1%XSPI cash paid, 1 year
−3.7%PCOV total return, 1 year
+11.6%XSPI total return, 1 year
PCOV3 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPY
XSPIAbout even with SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+11.3%XSPI+11.6%11.1% of it arrived as cashabout even with SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+11.3%XSPI+11.6%11.1% as cashabout even with SPY

Performance, window by window

PCOV and XSPI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
PCOVXSPIPCOVXSPIPCOVXSPI
3 monthsnot published+3.7%not published4.2%not published+1.4 pts
6 monthsnot published+20.0%not published9.2%not published+1.9 pts
Since launch−3.7%+11.6%0.0%11.1%−3.0 pts+0.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PCOV and XSPI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PCOV
Principal Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY
XSPI
NEOS Boosted S&P 500(R) High Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerPrincipalNEOS
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualizednot published17.1%
Expense ratio0.34%0.98%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)11.1% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−3.7%−0.3%
Total return, 1 year−3.7% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)+11.6% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year−0.7%+11.3%
Ahead or behind−3.0 pts+0.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published99%
Age30 days227 days
Net assetsnot published$113m

PCOV in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, PCOV paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −0.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts.

XSPI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XSPI paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +11.3% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.1%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, PCOV or XSPI?
PCOV charges 0.34% a year and XSPI charges 0.98%, so PCOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PCOV against XSPI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PCOV against XSPI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pcov-vs-xspi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources