Data as of .
LFGY vs XRPM: which paid, and which earned it?
LFGY and XRPM both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, LFGY and XRPM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in LFGY | Only in XRPM |
|---|---|
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 13.21% | XRPC 12/18/2026 11.25 C 27.22% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.68% | Canary XRP ETF 26.37% |
| Block Inc 5.36% | Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12/31/2031 23.01% |
| Riot Platforms Inc 5.31% | United States Treasury Bill 11/05/2026 8.34% |
| Galaxy Digital Inc 5.19% | United States Treasury Bill 11/24/2026 8.32% |
| Opera Ltd 5.00% | Cash & Other 6.98% |
| HUT 8 CORP 4.66% | United States Treasury Bill 11/19/2026 6.24% |
| Strategy Inc 4.38% | United States Treasury Bill 11/03/2026 4.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFGY | XRPM | LFGY | XRPM | LFGY | XRPM | |
| 3 months | −0.3% | −3.8% | 10.6% | 8.3% | +1.9 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +25.6% | −21.4% | 26.4% | 14.4% | −8.2 pts | −55.3 pts |
| 1 year | −1.5% | not published | 40.1% | not published | −13.6 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +9.5% | −48.5% | 62.4% | 15.6% | −42.8 pts | −76.3 pts |
| LFGY YieldMax(R) Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF Synthetic covered call on BITQ, paying weekly | XRPM Amplify XRP 3 Monthly Premium Income ETF Covered call on BITQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | Amplify |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy | Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 39.4% | 37.4% |
| Expense ratio | 1.02% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 40.1% | 15.6% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | −44.7% | −60.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.5% | −48.5% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +12.1% | +27.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −13.6 pts | −76.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 63% | not published |
| Age | 612 days | 304 days |
| Net assets | $110m | $12m |
LFGY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LFGY paid 40.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 44.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy returned +12.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 39.4%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 63% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XRPM in plain words
Over the period since launch on Nov 18, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, XRPM paid 15.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 60.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −48.5%. Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy returned +27.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 76.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.4%, paid monthly.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, LFGY against XRPM, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lfgy-vs-xrpm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.