JANQ vs SCA: which paid, and which earned it?

JANQ and SCA both write options for income. Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January and GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF.

0.0%
JANQ cash paid, since launch
12.8%
SCA cash paid, since launch
0.0%
JANQ total return, since launch
+17.8%
SCA total return, since launch
JANQ · since launch to Sep 30, 20260.9 pts behind SPY
JANQ
0.0%
SPY
+0.9%

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SCA · since launch to Sep 30, 202610.3 pts ahead of SMCI
SCA
+17.8%
SMCI
+7.5%

10.3 pts ahead of SMCI

SCA since launch: paid 12.8%, price +2.9%, total +17.8%, SMCI +7.5%, +10.3 pts.

SMCI

+7.5%

SCA

+17.8%

12.8% of it arrived as cash

10.3 pts ahead of SMCI

Total return, distributions reinvested

10.3 pts ahead of SMCI

SCA since launch: paid 12.8%, price +2.9%, total +17.8%, SMCI +7.5%, +10.3 pts.

SMCI

+7.5%

SCA

+17.8%

12.8% as cash

10.3 pts ahead of SMCI

12.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +17.8%. SCA since launch: paid 12.8%, price +2.9%, total +17.8%, SMCI +7.5%, +10.3 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowJANQSCAJANQSCAJANQSCA
3 monthsnot published+38.2%not published8.0%not published−10.4 pts
Since launch
JANQ Sep 2026 · SCA May 2026
0.0%+17.8%0.0%12.8%−0.9 pts+10.3 pts

JANQ and SCA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

JANQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY
SCA
GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF · Autocallable on SMCI, paying monthly
Issuer Innovator GraniteShares
Strategy defined income autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Super Micro (SMCI)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized not published 36.6%
Expense ratio 0.79% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 12.8% (since launch on May 27, 2026)
Price change, 1 year 0.0% +2.9%
Total return, 1 year 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +17.8% (since launch on May 27, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% +7.5%
Ahead or behind −0.9 pts +10.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 29%
Age 20 days 126 days
Net assets not published $2m

JANQ and SCA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

JANQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, JANQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned 0.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts.

SCA in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, SCA paid 12.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.8%. Super Micro (SMCI) returned +7.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 10.3 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 36.6%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 29% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, JANQ or SCA?
JANQ charges 0.79% a year and SCA charges 1.07%, so JANQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, JANQ against SCA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janq-vs-sca

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.