Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

HJAN vs QYLG: which paid, and which earned it?

HJAN and QYLG both write options for income.

Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - January and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

0.0%HJAN cash paid, 1 year
17.4%QYLG cash paid, 1 year
0.0%HJAN total return, 1 year
+22.2%QYLG total return, 1 year
HJAN0.8 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+0.8%HJAN0.0%0.8 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+0.8%HJAN0.0%0.8 pts behind SPY
QYLGAbout even with QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% of it arrived as cashabout even with QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% as cashabout even with QQQ

Performance, window by window

HJAN and QYLG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
HJANQYLGHJANQYLGHJANQYLG
3 monthsnot published−0.1%not published2.1%not published+2.4 pts
6 monthsnot published+19.6%not published4.6%not published−4.7 pts
1 yearnot published+22.2%not published17.4%not published+0.5 pts
3 yearsnot published+76.2%not published51.1%not published−22.0 pts
Since launch0.0%+122.0%0.0%75.3%−0.8 pts−52.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
HJAN and QYLG on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HJAN
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - January
Buffer with income on SPY
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerInnovatorGlobal X
Strategybuffer with incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualizednot published6.8%
Expense ratio0.79%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)17.4%
Price change, 1 year0.0%+2.4%
Total return, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)+22.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+0.8%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−0.8 pts+0.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published96%
Age8 days2187 days
Net assetsnot published$175m

HJAN in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, HJAN paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned 0.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +0.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts.

QYLG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, HJAN or QYLG?
HJAN charges 0.79% a year and QYLG charges 0.35%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HJAN against QYLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HJAN against QYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hjan-vs-qylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources