Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

HJAN vs QDTY: which paid, and which earned it?

HJAN and QDTY both write options for income.

Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - January and YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

0.0%HJAN cash paid, 1 year
30.9%QDTY cash paid, 1 year
0.0%HJAN total return, 1 year
+20.2%QDTY total return, 1 year
HJAN0.8 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+0.8%HJAN0.0%0.8 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+0.8%HJAN0.0%0.8 pts behind SPY
QDTY1.6 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% of it arrived as cash1.6 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% as cash1.6 pts behind QQQ

Performance, window by window

HJAN and QDTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
HJANQDTYHJANQDTYHJANQDTY
3 monthsnot published−0.9%not published7.9%not published+1.6 pts
6 monthsnot published+20.7%not published17.3%not published−3.6 pts
1 yearnot published+20.2%not published30.9%not published−1.6 pts
Since launch0.0%+27.1%0.0%42.0%−0.8 pts−8.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
HJAN and QDTY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HJAN
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - January
Buffer with income on SPY
QDTY
YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerInnovatorYieldMax
Strategybuffer with income0DTE covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysnot establishedweekly
Payout rate, annualizednot published25.9%
Expense ratio0.79%1.17%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)30.9%
Price change, 1 year0.0%−14.0%
Total return, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)+20.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+0.8%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−0.8 pts−1.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published94%
Age8 days582 days
Net assetsnot published$27m

HJAN in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, HJAN paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned 0.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +0.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts.

QDTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, HJAN or QDTY?
HJAN charges 0.79% a year and QDTY charges 1.17%, so HJAN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HJAN against QDTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HJAN against QDTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hjan-vs-qdty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources