Data as of .
HEMI vs SCLZ: which paid, and which earned it?
HEMI and SCLZ both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HEMI and SCLZ hold 51% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | HEMI | SCLZ |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 9.11% | 5.99% |
| Apple Inc | 5.86% | 6.15% |
| Alphabet Inc | 7.69% | 5.18% |
| Broadcom Inc | 4.02% | 4.71% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 5.73% | 3.75% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.72% | 3.71% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 2.66% | 3.34% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 2.42% | 3.50% |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 2.13% | 3.86% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.89% | 5.14% |
| Mastercard Inc | 2.04% | 1.74% |
| Walmart Inc | 1.70% | 1.48% |
| Only in HEMI | Only in SCLZ |
|---|---|
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 1.71% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 3.10% |
| KLA Corp 1.39% | JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.41% |
| Intercontinental Exchange Inc 1.28% | VISA INC 2.27% |
| AutoZone Inc 1.21% | CATERPILLAR INC 1.84% |
| Marriott International Inc/MD 1.12% | ABBVIE INC 1.82% |
| ITT Inc 1.12% | HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 1.51% |
| Corning Inc 1.03% | DEERE & COMPANY 1.17% |
| Gilead Sciences Inc 1.02% | UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.11% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEMI | SCLZ | HEMI | SCLZ | HEMI | SCLZ | |
| 3 months | +0.8% | +2.9% | 2.2% | 2.1% | −1.5 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | +13.6% | +14.2% | 4.9% | 3.8% | −4.5 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +13.2% | not published | 8.4% | not published | −14.0 pts |
| Since launch | +11.2% | +36.5% | 6.0% | 19.6% | −3.4 pts | −6.3 pts |
| HEMI Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Hartford | Swan |
| Strategy | covered call | dividend stocks with call overlay |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.1% | 8.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.0% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) | 8.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +4.9% | +4.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.2% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) | +13.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +14.7% | +27.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −3.4 pts | −14.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 275 days | 934 days |
| Net assets | $33m | $20m |
HEMI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Dec 17, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, HEMI paid 6.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.
SCLZ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, HEMI or SCLZ?
- HEMI charges 0.49% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so HEMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HEMI against SCLZ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hemi-vs-sclz Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.