Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GPTY vs YRAM: which paid, and which earned it?

GPTY and YRAM both write options for income.

YieldMax(R) AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF and YieldMax Memory and Storage Portfolio Option Income ETF.

34.0%GPTY cash paid, 1 year
1.6%YRAM cash paid, 1 year
+32.4%GPTY total return, 1 year
+6.1%YRAM total return, 1 year
GPTY5.7 pts behind XLK · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLK+38.0%GPTY+32.4%34.0% of it arrived as cash5.7 pts behind XLKTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLK+38.0%GPTY+32.4%34.0% as cash5.7 pts behind XLK
YRAM3 pts ahead of SMH · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SMH+3.1%YRAM+6.1%3 pts ahead of SMHTotal return, distributions reinvestedSMH+3.1%YRAM+6.1%3 pts ahead of SMH

Performance, window by window

GPTY and YRAM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GPTYYRAMGPTYYRAMGPTYYRAM
3 months−1.3%not published8.2%not published−0.5 ptsnot published
6 months+40.4%not published22.2%not published−0.1 ptsnot published
1 year+32.4%not published34.0%not published−5.7 ptsnot published
Since launch+53.2%+6.1%51.0%1.6%−4.9 pts+3.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GPTY and YRAM on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GPTY
YieldMax(R) AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
Synthetic covered call on XLK, paying weekly
YRAM
YieldMax Memory and Storage Portfolio Option Income ETF
Synthetic covered call on SMH
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Strategysynthetic covered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkTechnology sector (XLK)Semiconductors (SMH), used as the proxy
Paysweeklynot established
Payout rate, annualized35.3%8.8%
Expense ratio1.06%not published
Cash paid, 1 year34.0%1.6% (since launch on Aug 25, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−8.1%+4.5%
Total return, 1 year+32.4%+6.1% (since launch on Aug 25, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+38.0%+3.1%
Ahead or behind−5.7 pts+3.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate94%97%
Age603 days24 days
Net assets$126m$5m

GPTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPTY paid 34.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +32.4%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +38.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 35.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

YRAM in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 25, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, YRAM paid 1.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.1%. Semiconductors (SMH), used as the proxy returned +3.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid periodically. YieldMax estimates that 97% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GPTY against YRAM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPTY against YRAM, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpty-vs-yram Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources